← 論文一覧に戻る

Climate effects of management intensity and rotation length for planted pine systems

植林松システムにおける管理強度と伐期長の気候影響 (AI 翻訳)

Sarah J. Puls, Justin S. Baker, Rachel L. Cook, James L. Rakestraw

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-16#炭素会計Origin: US対象セクター: forestry
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-026-10335-z
原典: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-026-10335-z
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

米国南部のロブロリーパイン植林を対象に、動的ライフサイクルアセスメントを用いて36の管理シナリオの気候影響を比較。炭素蓄積量のみでは気候影響を正確に評価できず、放射強制力指標の必要性を強調。間伐や伐期長の調整は立地条件に応じて行うべきと示唆。

English

Using dynamic life cycle assessment, this study compares climate effects of 36 management scenarios for loblolly pine plantations in the southern U.S. It finds that carbon stock estimates alone fail to accurately reflect climate impacts, emphasizing the need for radiative forcing metrics. Management decisions like thinning and rotation length should be site-specific, as generalized strategies like extending rotations have little effect.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の森林吸収源対策やJ-クレジット制度における炭素算定方法の精緻化に示唆。炭素蓄積量のみに依存する評価の限界を指摘し、温暖化緩和効果を正確に反映する算定手法の重要性を提起。

In the global GX context

This study contributes to global discussions on forest carbon accounting methodologies, particularly for managed plantations. It challenges the reliance on carbon stock estimates and supports the use of radiative forcing metrics, relevant for climate disclosure frameworks like TCFD and ISSB that require accurate GHG accounting.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Highlights the need for dynamic LCA and radiative forcing metrics in forest carbon accounting.

🏢実務担当者:Informs forest management decisions to optimize climate mitigation, relevant for carbon offset projects.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests that carbon accounting policies should incorporate radiative forcing to accurately reflect climate benefits.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Abstract Managed forests, including plantation systems, play a vital and often underappreciated role in contributing to the global carbon sink and mitigating climate change, and determining the most effective mitigation strategies requires accounting methods that accurately assess the climate effects of forests. We use a dynamic life cycle assessment methodology to compare the climate effects of thirty-six forest management scenarios (varying site productivity, planting density, fertilization, and thinning) with varying rotation lengths for loblolly pine plantations in the southern U.S., including both in situ and ex situ greenhouse gas fluxes. We also evaluate the effectiveness of using only carbon stock estimates to assess the net climate effect of a given management regime relative to radiative forcing metrics. Carbon stocks alone failed to accurately portray the climate effects from different management regimes, emphasizing the need for greenhouse gas accounting methodologies that directly represent the effect of forest management on potential atmospheric warming mitigation efforts. When radiative forcing is used for comparison, our results show that management decisions such as thinning and rotation length should be adjusted based on stand-specific conditions, and that overgeneralized strategies, such as extending rotation lengths, had little effect on net radiative forcing for many scenarios.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。