逆説的農業：食料生産・気候行動・生態系健全性・SDGsの均衡を図る条件付き枠組みとして
Paradoxical agriculture as a conditional framework for balancing food production, climate action, ecosystem health and the sustainable development goals (原題)
Muhammad Yasir Malik, Muhammad Ahmad, Muhammad Sheraz, Asia Maqbool, Waqas Liaqat, Muhammad Aasım, Usman Mohammed Ali, Muhammad Tanveer Altaf
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
農業生産性向上と生態系劣化の緊張関係を、食料安全保障・水・気候・生物多様性の観点から整理した統合的批評レビュー。環境コストの農外転嫁、効率改善を資源削減と誤認する点、移行コストの責任所在の不明確さという三つの再帰的課題を指摘する。土地再生と在来種の参加型 domestication を結ぶ「Land Maxing」を提案するが、比較評価は未実施。農業の逆説を不可避な結果ではなく条件付きで検証可能な関係として捉え直す枠組みを提示する。
English
An integrative critical review of tensions between agricultural productivity gains and ecological degradation across food security, water, climate and biodiversity. It identifies three recurring issues: environmental costs shifted off-farm, efficiency gains mistaken for resource reduction, and unclear responsibility for transition costs. 'Land Maxing' is proposed as a pathway linking degraded-land restoration with participatory domestication of indigenous species, though untested against a comparator. The framework reframes agricultural paradoxes as conditional, testable relationships.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、食料・農林業のScope 3排出や生物多様性開示（TNFD）を検討する企業・自治体にとって、農業由来の環境コストの分配と評価枠組みを考える補助線になる。ただしSSBJ・有報対応への直接的な実務示唆は乏しい。
In the global GX context
For global disclosure scholarship, the paper's emphasis on off-farm cost shifting and distributional responsibility speaks to Scope 3 agricultural accounting and TNFD/CSRD biodiversity and value-chain reporting debates, though it offers no quantitative disclosure metrics.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:農業の環境外部性と分配を評価する際の概念的枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:食品・農業サプライチェーンのScope 3や生物多様性開示を検討する際の論点整理に使える。
🏛政策担当者:農業支援策が環境コストを農外に転嫁していないか、政策評価の視点として留意すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Improvements in agricultural production are possible without degrading ecological resources; however, the benefits that enable sustainable food security are often unequally distributed. This integrative and critical narrative review explores these tensions in relation to food security, water resources, resource use, climate change and terrestrial biodiversity. The evidence base comprises a synthesis of key publications from the initial bibliography, supplemented by focused verification and literature updates conducted on 15 September 2026 using publisher databases, scholarly literature and intergovernmental reports. Production benefits are qualitatively structured according to delayed costs, implications for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), intervention mechanisms and constraints. Three recurring issues arise: environmental costs and benefits are shifted off-farm, efficiency gains are mistaken for actual resource reductions and responsibility for transition costs and benefits remains unclear. Evidence supports several component practices, including diversification and improved resource management, but no single named sustainability approach has consistently achieved all desired outcomes. Land Maxing is examined as a proposed pathway linking restoration of degraded land with participatory domestication of culturally valued indigenous species and locally retained enterprise income; its components have empirical support, but the full pathway has not yet been evaluated against a comparator. The proposed framework reframes agricultural paradoxes as conditional and testable relationships rather than inevitable consequences of intensification. Its primary function is to provide a common framework for assessing mechanisms, distributional impacts and scale-dependent consequences. Study selection was purposive, evidence designs were heterogeneous and no pooled effect size was calculated due to methodological diversity. Successful transition requires locally relevant bundles of practices, credible ecological boundaries, secure rights and integrated assessment of production and welfare outcomes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-05190-6first seen 2026-11-04 05:08:03 · last seen 2026-11-06 05:03:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。