A Law and Political Economy Analysis of an International Carbon Price Floor on AI
AIに対する国際炭素価格フロアの法政治経済分析 (AI 翻訳)
Susanna Ruth Gruyal
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
IMFが提案するAIの炭素排出への国際炭素価格下限（ICPF）を、法と政治経済学の観点から批判的に分析。市場効率性の想定が、中小企業やグローバルサウンドに不利に働く可能性を指摘し、より包摂的な気候政策を求める。
English
This paper critically analyzes the IMF's proposed International Carbon Price Floor (ICPF) on AI carbon emissions through a law and political economy lens. It argues that market-based efficiency assumptions mask inequities, disadvantaging smaller firms and Global South countries, and calls for more inclusive and democratic climate policy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はAI開発と炭素価格制度（GXリーグ、2028年からの炭素賦課金）を進めており、本論文のICPF批判は国内政策設計に示唆を与える。AIのエネルギー消費増加に伴い、公平な炭素価格設定の議論が重要になる。
In the global GX context
The IMF's ICPF proposal is a major global climate policy initiative; this paper provides a critical perspective on market-based carbon pricing applied to AI. It highlights equity concerns relevant to international climate negotiations and the design of AI sustainability regulations worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights the intersection of AI and carbon pricing, offering a critical framework for evaluating market-based climate policies.
🏛政策担当者:Provides considerations for designing carbon pricing mechanisms that avoid exacerbating inequalities, especially for AI developers in developing countries.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) revolution promises significant economic progress and development, as well as innovative solutions for addressing environmental damage and climate change. However, AI use has resulted in higher carbon emissions. In response to growing scrutiny over AI’s carbon footprint, the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) has proposed an international carbon price floor (“ICPF”) to put a minimum price on carbon depending on each country’s development level. The ICPF leverages market forces to efficiently ramp up the Nationally Determined Contributions of states under the Paris Agreement and internalizes the social costs of carbon emissions. However, its seemingly straightforward benefits mask entrenched inequities. This Note provides a critical analysis through a law and political economy (“LPE”) framework. It examines the role of market and political structures in shaping the implementation of the proposed climate policy, and how these affect the development and use of AI in smaller companies, in particular, and Global South countries in general. This Note aims to dispel the notion that AI policies relying on market efficiency are neutral and apolitical. Through the LPE lens, this Note argues how climate policy must move beyond the illusion of market efficiency to foster a more inclusive, equitable, and democratic global change.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.66077/ldhr7579first seen 2026-06-20 05:07:41
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。