循環経済モデルの資金調達：廃棄物削減と持続可能な資源利用のための政策手段
Financing Circular Economy Models: Policy Instruments for Waste Reduction and Sustainable Resource Use (原題)
O. Akomolehin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は循環経済（CE）への移行を支える資金調達メカニズムを政策志向でレビューしたもの。EU、中国、ルワンダ、オランダ、南アフリカの比較事例を通じ、EUタクソノミー、エコ工業団地、プラスチック禁止令、CE革新基金、EPR制度などの政策手段が投資動員にどう寄与するかを分析。ブレンドファイナンス、グリーンボンド、生産者負担型EPRが投資リスクを低減し安定的な資金源を生む一方、途上国ではインフラ不足や高い資本コストが制約となると結論づける。
English
This policy-oriented review examines financing mechanisms for the circular economy (CE), analyzing how regulatory, market-based, and capacity-building instruments mobilize investment for waste reduction. Comparative cases from the EU, China, Rwanda, the Netherlands, and South Africa show that blended finance, green bonds, innovation grants, and producer-funded EPR schemes effectively reduce investment risk and create predictable funding. Institutional coherence and regulatory clarity are key enablers, while infrastructure deficits and high capital costs constrain developing economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では循環経済は「循環型社会形成推進基本計画」や資源循環関連法制で進むが、本論文が示すEPRやブレンドファイナンスの設計は、国内のプラスチック資源循環法やグリーンボンド発行体にとって資金調達スキームの参考になる。SSBJ開示とは直接連動しないが、サーキュラー調達やScope3上流の資源リスク管理に関わる企業には示唆がある。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper connects circular-economy financing to the broader transition-finance and green-bond agenda, complementing TCFD/ISSB disclosure by showing how policy instruments like the EU Taxonomy and EPR schemes channel capital into waste reduction. It offers evidence on blended finance and producer-funded mechanisms that can inform CSRD-aligned resource-use reporting and national circular-economy strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:循環経済の資金調達ギャップと政策手段の有効性を比較事例で整理したレビューとして、政策金融研究の出発点になる。
🏢実務担当者:EPRやグリーンボンド、ブレンドファイナンスを活用した循環型調達・廃棄物削減投資の設計に参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:EUタクソノミーやEPRなど、規制と資金供給を組み合わせた循環経済政策パッケージの設計示唆を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The transition to a circular economy (CE) is central to advancing cleaner production, reducing waste, and promoting sustainable resource use. However, large-scale CE adoption remains constrained by financing gaps, regulatory weaknesses, and limited institutional capacity, particularly in emerging and developing economies. This study presents a policy-oriented review of circular economy financing mechanisms, examining how regulatory, economic, market-based, and capacity-building instruments mobilize investment for waste reduction and resource efficiency. Using evidence from 2019 to 2025 and comparative case studies from the European Union, China, Rwanda, the Netherlands, and South Africa, the analysis demonstrates that integrated policy–finance architectures are critical for scaling circular initiatives. Policy instruments such as the EU Taxonomy, eco-industrial parks in China, Rwanda’s plastic ban, Dutch CE innovation funds, and South Africa’s mandatory extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes illustrate how coordinated regulation and financing can stimulate circular markets and strengthen recycling systems. The findings show that blended finance, green bonds, innovation grants, and producer-funded EPR mechanisms are particularly effective in reducing investment risk, creating predictable funding streams, and supporting technology diffusion. Institutional coherence, regulatory clarity, and governance quality emerge as key enablers of successful CE financing, while infrastructure deficits, high capital costs, and limited investor confidence remain major constraints in developing economies. The study concludes that accelerating CE transitions requires a synergistic mix of policy instruments and financing mechanisms aligned with national development priorities, supporting sustainable waste management and resource-efficient development in line with SDGs 9, 11, 12, and 13.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://journals.abuad.edu.ng/ijerse/article/download/3345/1375first seen 2026-09-18 05:12:04 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:09:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。