gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Green fiscal policy in Moldova: alignment with the European Union standards for sustainable transition

モルドバの環境財政政策：持続可能な移行のためのEU基準との整合性 (AI 翻訳)

Corina Chironachi, Dorina Clichici

Economy and Sociologyプレプリント2026-03-01#炭素価格Origin: EU
DOI: 10.36004/nier.es.2025.2-03
原典: https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2025.2-03

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

モルドバのEU加盟候補国としての環境財政政策の現状を分析。炭素価格制度や環境税の収入データ（2018-2024）を用い、EU基準とのギャップを特定。包括的な炭素価格制度の欠如やグリーンプロジェクトへの資金不足などの課題を指摘し、気候予算タグ付けや拡大生産者責任（EPR）の必要性を提言。政策決定者への示唆を提供。

English

This paper analyzes Moldova's green fiscal policy in the context of its EU candidate status, using comparative legal analysis and quantitative data on environmental tax revenues (2018-2024). It identifies gaps such as the lack of a comprehensive carbon pricing system, underfunding of green projects, and administrative barriers. It recommends carbon pricing, climate budget tagging (CBT), and extended producer responsibility (EPR) to align with EU standards. The findings offer insights for policymakers to transform fiscal policy into a driver for sustainable transition.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

モルドバのような中小国のEU加盟に向けた環境財政政策の事例は、日本の気候関連政策（GX推進法やカーボンプライシング検討）にとっても示唆がある。特に炭素価格制度や環境税の収入活用は、日本の環境税制改革や地方自治体のグリーン予算編成にも参考となる。ただし、日本はEU非加盟であり直接的な基準整合はないが、国際的な炭素価格調和の議論に貢献する。

In the global GX context

This paper provides a detailed case study of a candidate country's efforts to align green fiscal policy with EU standards, which is relevant for global discussions on carbon pricing and environmental taxation. The barriers identified (lack of carbon pricing, underfunding) are common in many emerging economies. The recommendations on climate budget tagging and EPR are applicable beyond Moldova, offering lessons for developing countries and for international frameworks like the World Bank's climate finance initiatives.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides an empirical analysis of green fiscal policy in an EU candidate country, useful for comparative studies on environmental taxation and carbon pricing in transition economies.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams in Moldova or similar markets can understand the regulatory direction and prepare for upcoming carbon pricing and EPR obligations.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights specific fiscal measures (carbon pricing, CBT, EPR) needed to align with EU standards, offering actionable insights for ministries of finance and environment in candidate countries.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Moldova has been a candidate country for European Union (EU) membership since 2022. With this status came the commitment to align its national policies with European standards. This article analyses the current state of green fiscal policy, the actions needed to meet EU requirements, and highlights its role in the green transition and sustainable development. The methodology used includes both a comparative analysis of the legal framework and a quantitative analysis of green tax revenues between 2018 and 2024, the data being selected from the Eurostat and the Ministry of Finance of Moldova databases. The results suggest that fiscal policies are not yet fully integrated into a coherent strategy for financing the green transition. However, progress has been made towards building an environmental taxation system. Several obstacles have been identified. These include the lack of a comprehensive carbon-pricing system, underfunding of green projects, and structural and administrative barriers. This article is relevant due to the main gaps and opportunities for fiscal alignment that have been identified. It was emphasised that the establishment of a carbon pricing system, climate budget tagging (CBT), and extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes is necessary. The paper provides insights for policy decisions, helping to transform green fiscal policy from a mere revenue-raising tool into an engine for Moldova's sustainable transition.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。