すべての人のための手頃なエネルギーとモビリティ:持続可能な移行への道筋
Affordable Energy & Mobility for All: Pathways in the Sustainable Transition (原題)
Patrick Jochem
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
持続可能な交通システムは、バッテリーコスト低下や輸入化石燃料依存の減少を通じて、従来型経路よりもシステム全体のコストを削減できると論じる。国内資源と電化・セクターカップリングは経済的レジリエンスと安定性を高め、地政学リスクを低減する。エネルギー経済学者に対し、透明なエビデンス発信、学際的システムモデルの構築、家計間の分配影響評価の責任を求める。
English
Sustainable transport systems can lower overall system costs versus business-as-usual through falling battery costs and reduced reliance on imported fossil fuels. Domestic energy resources, electrification, and sector coupling enhance economic resilience and reduce geopolitical risk. The author calls on energy economists to communicate evidence transparently, build open multidisciplinary system models, and rigorously assess distributional impacts across households.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では電動化・再エネ調達とエネルギー安全保障がGX政策の中心課題であり、本稿のシステム視点はSSBJ開示における気候レジリエンス・移行計画の議論にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Amid global debates on transition finance and ISSB/TCFD resilience disclosure, this work reframes decarbonization as a whole-system cost and resilience question, complementing disclosure-focused scholarship with economic evidence on electrification and import dependence.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:交通・エネルギー統合モデルと分配影響評価の枠組みをどう設計すべきかの論点を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:電動化・再エネ調達がコストとサプライチェーン強靱性に与える便益を社内説明に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:輸入依存とセクター間相互作用を明示した統合評価が、移行政策の費用・レジリエンス・公平性判断に有用。
📄 Abstract(原文)
The presentation is on three statements on the session title "Affordable Energy & Mobility for All: Pathways in the Sustainable Transition". The presentation is an impulse to the following discussion we had during the conference. Sustainable transport systems reduce overall system costs relative to a business-as-usual pathway. Declining battery costs lower the investment required for electrification, while reduced dependence on imported fossil fuels decreases exposure to volatile international energy markets. Additional benefits arise from lower environmental and health externalities and from stronger integration with the energy system, enabling flexibility services and positive spillovers across sectors. When these factors are assessed from a whole-system perspective, sustainable transport can deliver economic advantages that extend beyond direct fuel and vehicle costs. Sustainable transport and energy systems can enhance economic resilience and system stability. Greater reliance on domestic energy resources and electricity reduces dependence on imported fuels and associated geopolitical risks. At the same time, diversified supply chains, a broader range of technology providers, and more heterogeneous business models strengthen robustness against external shocks. Electrification and sector coupling can also reduce short-term vulnerabilities by increasing operational flexibility. Overall, these characteristics contribute to a more stable and adaptable transport-energy system under uncertain future conditions. Energy economists have a critical responsibility in guiding the transition towards sustainable transport and energy systems. This requires transparent and clear communication of evidence, the development and coordination of open and multidisciplinary system models, and rigorous assessment of distributional impacts across heterogeneous households. Analyses should explicitly account for import dependencies, domestic structural effects, and interactions between transport and energy sectors. By adopting integrated system perspectives, economists can provide policymakers with more robust insights into costs, resilience, equity, and long-term welfare outcomes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://elib.dlr.de/226736/1/Jochem_IAEE.pdffirst seen 2026-10-04 04:40:36
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。