Multidimensional Evaluation and Synergistic Development Strategies for Regional Carbon Neutrality: An Analysis of China’s Provincial Systems
地域カーボンニュートラルの多次元評価と相乗的発展戦略:中国の省級システムの分析 (AI 翻訳)
Dazhi Linghu, Rui Meng, Haicang Yan, Xinli Wu, Li Li
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、エントロピー重みTOPSIS、K-meansクラスタリング、障害因子診断モデルを用いて、中国30省のカーボンニュートラルを多面的に評価する枠組みを構築した。「東高西低」の空間パターンと5つの省類型を明らかにし、低炭素交通、技術、哲学が主な障害要因であることを示した。地域の特性に応じた協調的政策の重要性を提言している。
English
This paper constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation framework for carbon neutrality in 30 Chinese provinces using Entropy Weight-TOPSIS, K-means clustering, and obstacle factor diagnosis. It reveals a spatial pattern of 'high east, low west' and identifies five provincial types. Key obstacles include low-carbon transportation, technology, and philosophy, which vary across groups. The study provides policy recommendations for synergistic carbon neutrality promotion.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の省レベルでのカーボンニュートラル評価フレームワークは、日本の都道府県レベルでのGX評価にも応用可能な示唆を含む。特に、複数指標による総合評価と障害要因の特定方法は、日本の地域別カーボンニュートラル戦略の立案に参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of China's provincial carbon neutrality, filling a gap in heterogeneous obstacle diagnosis. The multi-dimensional framework (green economy, politics, culture, society, ecology) is novel and offers empirical evidence for coordinated carbon neutrality governance, relevant for global discussions on regional climate strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper contributes a multi-dimensional evaluation framework and identifies heterogeneous obstacles, valuable for comparative carbon neutrality studies.
🏢実務担当者:Provincial governments can use the typology and obstacle diagnosis to tailor carbon neutrality strategies.
🏛政策担当者:The findings highlight the need for differentiated policies based on regional characteristics, informing national and subnational climate planning.
📄 Abstract(原文)
As the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals advance rapidly, grasping the development status and differences in carbon neutrality across China’s provincial regions is crucial for interpreting the regional collaborative governance pattern under the circular economy initiative and promoting responsible production and consumption transformation. This paper constructs a research framework for the comprehensive evaluation and collaborative strategy of carbon neutrality. Using the Entropy Weight-TOPSIS, K-means clustering, and obstacle factor diagnosis models, the development status of carbon neutrality in 30 Chinese provinces is revealed from the perspectives of green economy, green politics, green culture, green society, and green ecology. Regional differences and critical obstacle factors are identified. Guided by the “Five-sphere Integrated Plan,” this study refines the carbon neutrality evaluation framework and fills an existing gap in the literature regarding the diagnosis of heterogeneous obstacles. It provides empirical evidence for the coordinated advancement of carbon neutrality. We find that (1) China’s overall carbon neutrality capability is relatively weak, showing a spatial pattern of “high in the east and low in the west” and a Matthew effect of “the strong getting stronger and the weak getting weaker.” The development levels of the subsystems vary markedly, with excellent and underperforming subsystems coexisting across different provinces. (2) The 30 provinces are classified as comprehensive leading, balanced-developing, policy-economy dual-driven, ecology-driven, and potential-oriented. (3) Overall, the key obstacle factors are low-carbon transportation, technology, and philosophy, yet these factors vary across the groups. To foster collaborative carbon neutrality promotion, policies should be implemented in the future based on different characteristics.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。