Governance-Driven Macro-Level Health Outcomes: Operationalizing the Sustainability Nexus Through Cross-National Environmental Informatics
ガバナンス主導のマクロレベル健康成果:国家間環境情報学を通じた持続可能性ネクサスの運用 (AI 翻訳)
Chitralada Chaiya
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はASEAN諸国における、制度の質、エネルギー転換、人口の健康・発展成果の関連を実証的に分析した。SEMを用いたパネルデータ分析の結果、制度の質はエネルギー転換に有意に関連し、エネルギー転換は健康・発展成果に有意に関連することが示された。エネルギー転換が制度の質と健康・発展成果の間を媒介するメカニズムが明らかになった。
English
This study empirically examines the relationships among institutional quality, energy transition, and population health and development outcomes in ASEAN-10 states using SEM on panel data (2000-2020). Results show that institutional quality is significantly associated with energy transition, which in turn is associated with health outcomes. The mediation effect of energy transition is confirmed, supporting a governance-sustainability framework.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
この研究はASEAN諸国に焦点を当てており、日本のGX政策(アジアの脱炭素協力など)に直接的な示唆を提供するものではないが、制度とエネルギー転換の関連性は、日本がASEANへの技術支援やガバナンス強化を行う際の参考となる。
In the global GX context
This global study on ASEAN countries contributes to the understanding of how institutional quality drives energy transitions and health outcomes. While not directly about Japan, it offers insights for comparative governance and sustainability transitions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper provides evidence on the mediation role of energy transition between governance and development outcomes using SEM.
🏛政策担当者:The findings highlight the importance of strengthening institutional capacity for energy transition to achieve health and development goals.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Governance–Sustainability has increasingly emerged as an important framework for understanding how institutional capacity influences long-term development outcomes. This study empirically examines the relationships among Institutional Quality, Energy Transition, and Population Health and Development Outcomes within the ASEAN-10 states. Drawing upon the theoretical perspectives of New Institutionalism and Ecological Modernization Theory, the study employs Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze balanced longitudinal panel dataset (2000–2020) (N = 210 observations). The empirical results indicate that Institutional Quality is significantly associated with Energy Transition outcomes (β = −0.981, p < 0.001), while Energy Transition is significantly associated with Population Health and Development Outcomes (β = −0.982, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the findings provide evidence of a significant mediation effect, indicating that the relationship between Institutional Quality and Population Health and Development Outcomes operates indirectly through Energy Transition processes. The study contributes to the governance and sustainability literature by integrating institutional quality, sustainability transitions, and development outcomes within a unified Governance–Sustainability framework and supporting a Multi-Level Governance perspective. From a policy standpoint, the findings highlight the importance of strengthening institutional capacity and sustainability governance to support long-term development objectives. Overall, the results demonstrate that Institutional Quality functions as a foundational condition for sustainability transitions, while Energy Transition serves as a key mechanism linking governance capacity with Population Health and Development Outcomes in the ASEAN context.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136757first seen 2026-07-26 04:56:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。