gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

The WTO and Green Subsidies: Legal Tensions in the Climate Transition

WTOとグリーン補助金:気候移行における法的緊張 (AI 翻訳)

Ju Yuyue

Open MIND📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-28#政策Origin: Global
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19860110
原典: https://ijrlm.com/journal/the-wto-and-green-subsidies-legal-tensions-in-the-climate-transition/
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

この論文は、気候政策の重要な手段であるグリーン補助金とWTO法との間の法的緊張を分析する。WTOの補助金規律は伝統的な貿易歪曲防止を目的としており、気候変動対策の緊急性と適合していない。著者は、将来のガバナンスにおいて貿易ルールと気候政策のより良い調整が必要だと主張する。

English

This paper analyzes the legal tensions between green subsidies, a key climate policy tool, and WTO law. It argues that WTO subsidy disciplines based on preventing trade distortion are ill-suited for climate mitigation urgency. The author calls for better alignment between trade rules and climate policy objectives in future governance.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本にとっても、グリーン補助金はGX推進の鍵だが、WTOルールとの整合性が課題となる。本論文は、日本の政策立案者が国際貿易法の制約を理解する上で有用。

In the global GX context

This paper is relevant globally as governments navigate WTO constraints on green subsidies. It highlights the structural mismatch between trade fairness and climate urgency, informing international policy discussions on transition finance and industrial policy.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Trade law and climate policy scholars will gain insights into the legal challenges of implementing green subsidies under WTO rules.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams involved in policy advocacy can use this analysis to understand legal risks in subsidy-dependent decarbonization strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Trade and environment ministries should note the need for WTO reform to accommodate climate goals, as argued in this paper.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Green subsidies have become an essential instrument of climate policy, supporting decarbonisation, technological innovation, and the transition to cleaner production. Yet under WTO law, these measures may also distort markets by affecting prices, competition, and trade flows. This paper examines the tension between climate objectives and subsidy discipline within the WTO framework. It argues that existing WTO rules regulate green subsidies through traditional trade based criteria, but provide only limited adaptation for climate specific concerns. As a result, governments seeking to promote renewable energy and low carbon industries must navigate a legal system that is designed to prevent trade distortion rather than to facilitate climate mitigation. The analysis shows that the conflict reflects a deeper structural mismatch between trade fairness and climate urgency. While WTO law remains important in preventing disguised protectionism, it does not fully resolve the regulatory challenges posed by green subsidies. Future governance will therefore require better alignment between trade rules and climate policy objectives.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。