炭素管理研究における環境正義の非対称性
Environmental justice asymmetries in carbon management research (原題)
Roza Behroozi Nobar, Daniela Faggiani Dias, Soheil Shayegh, Mohammad Ilbeigi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
CDRとCCSの設計・実施に環境正義の三側面（手続き・分配・承認）がどう組み込まれているかを体系的スコーピングレビューで評価した研究。文献は断片化し、約3分の2がCCSに集中、研究はグローバル・ノースに偏在する。手続き的公正（主に市民の受容）が中心で、承認的公正はほとんど看過されている。承認的公正の組込み、実効的な住民参加、グローバル・サウスへの拡大、世代間影響の4点を研究優先課題として提示する。
English
A systematic scoping review of how procedural, distributive and recognition justice are incorporated into CDR and CCS design and deployment. The literature is fragmented, two-thirds focused on CCS and heavily concentrated in the Global North; procedural justice (mostly public perception) dominates while recognition justice is neglected. The authors propose four research priorities: embedding recognition justice and local perspectives, enabling meaningful community participation, expanding beyond the Global North, and examining intergenerational impacts.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではCCS/CDRの実装検討が本格化しつつあり、地域合意形成や受益と負担の分配は今後の制度設計・立地政策の焦点となる。社会的受容を軽視した導入は事業リスクを高めるため、国内のCCS適地選定や自治体協議の実務に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD disclosure expands to transition planning, the social and justice dimensions of carbon management are increasingly scrutinized by investors and regulators. This review flags that recognition justice is under-researched, a gap relevant to credible transition-plan assurance and to community-consent expectations in CDR/CCS project finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CDR/CCS研究における環境正義の偏在を整理し、承認的公正と世代間影響という未開拓領域の研究課題を提示する。
🏢実務担当者:CCS/CDRプロジェクトの住民協議・社会的受容設計において、手続き的公正だけでなく承認的公正への配慮が必要であることを示す。
🏛政策担当者:炭素管理政策の立案時に、地域・先住民の視点と世代間公平を組み込む必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate global climate change will require large-scale deployment of carbon management interventions, such as Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). However, their massive deployment raises pressing environmental justice concerns. In this paper, we present a systematic scoping review to assess how the different environmental justice dimensions (i.e. procedural, distributive and recognition) are incorporated into the design and implementation of CDR and CCS. We find that the literature is fragmented, with approximately two-thirds of the studies focusing on CCS and a strong concentration in the Global North. Procedural justice, mainly examined through public perception, dominates the field, while recognition justice remains largely neglected. Based on these findings, we identify four research priorities: incorporating recognition justice and local perspectives into CCS and CDR policies, developing mechanisms to enable meaningful community participation, expanding research beyond the Global North, and examining intergenerational impacts. Addressing these research priorities is essential to ensure that these mitigation interventions contribute to a just climate transition rather than reinforce existing inequalities. IMPACT STATEMENTThis review identifies significant imbalances in how environmental justice is addressed in carbon management research. While procedural justice receives considerable attention, recognition justice remain underexplored. The findings highlight the need for more comprehensive approaches to environmental justice in carbon management research. They can inform future research and support policymakers in developing more equitable climate mitigation strategies that consider the needs and perspectives of affected communities. This review identifies significant imbalances in how environmental justice is addressed in carbon management research. While procedural justice receives considerable attention, recognition justice remain underexplored. The findings highlight the need for more comprehensive approaches to environmental justice in carbon management research. They can inform future research and support policymakers in developing more equitable climate mitigation strategies that consider the needs and perspectives of affected communities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2026.2750839first seen 2026-11-07 05:01:34 · last seen 2026-11-07 05:02:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。