気候行動の実現：生物多様性・水・食料・健康にわたる共便益を生むネクサス・アプローチ
Enabling climate action: A nexus approach for delivering co-benefits across biodiversity, water, food, and health (原題)
Pramod Kumar Singh, Himangana Gupta, Julio Díaz‐José, Pamela D. McElwee, Cristina Tirado, Francesco Cherubini, Helena Duchková, Marcos Llope, Mariana Moncassim Vale, Shabana Khan, Akihiko Ito, Masakazu Hori, Siri Eriksen, Lakshmikant Tiwari, Sui Chian Phang, Daniel Mason-D'Croz, Xiyan Xu, Tiff L. van Huysen, Mario Herrero, Taylor H. Ricketts +2
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
IPBESネクサス評価に基づき、陸・海・エネルギー・都市・産業・社会の15の気候対応選択肢を比較分析。生態系中心・需要側の経路は生態学的機能を通じてシナジーを生みやすい一方、インフラ・技術中心の選択肢は土地利用や水需要、生物多様性リスク、 tenure、利益配分に左右され、効果が文脈依存的であることを示す。ネクサス・ガバナンスと地球システム正義を統合し、部門横断調整・分配的公平・手続き的包摂・説明責任ある資金・知識の多元性が正当性と持続性を形成すると論じる。
English
Drawing on the IPBES Nexus Assessment, this comparative analysis examines fifteen climate response options across land, ocean, energy, urban, industrial, and societal transitions. Ecosystem-centered and demand-side pathways more consistently yield synergies, while infrastructure- and technology-centered options show context-dependent wider effects shaped by land use, water demand, biodiversity risk, tenure, and benefit-sharing. Integrating nexus governance with Earth System Justice, it argues that cross-sectoral coordination, distributive equity, procedural inclusion, accountable finance, and knowledge pluralism determine whether outcomes become durable co-benefits.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業がTNFDや生物多様性保全、水リスク管理を統合報告書で開示する際、気候・自然・社会の共便益とトレードオフを評価する枠組みとして参考になる。SSBJや有報のサステナビリティ開示でネクサス視点を組み込む際の概念的基盤を提供する。
In the global GX context
As global disclosure frameworks (TCFD, ISSB, TNFD, CSRD) increasingly demand integrated climate-nature-society reporting, this paper offers a governance and justice lens for assessing co-benefits and trade-offs across nexus elements. It contributes to the scholarly basis for moving beyond siloed climate disclosure toward systemic, cross-sectoral accountability.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候対応の共便益とトレードオフをネクサスおよび正義の観点から分析する枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:気候・自然・水・健康の統合評価を通じ、TNFDや統合報告でのネクサス開示の設計に示唆を与える。
🏛政策担当者:部門横断調整と分配的公平を組み込んだ気候政策設計の必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate response options rarely affect biodiversity, water, food, and health in uniform ways. This comparative analysis examines why technically viable response options generate uneven cross-nexus outcomes, and how governance and justice conditions shape whether these outcomes become durable co-benefits. Anchored in the IPBES Nexus Assessment, the analysis synthesizes evidence from fifteen response options spanning land, ocean, energy, urban, industrial, and societal transitions. Ecosystem-centered and demand-side pathways more consistently produce synergies because they work through ecological functions that connect several nexus elements. Infrastructure- and technology-centered options deliver mitigation and health gains, but their wider effects are more context-dependent and often shaped by land use, water demand, biodiversity risk, tenure, access, and benefit-sharing. These patterns do not arise from technical design alone. By integrating nexus governance with Earth System Justice, the analysis indicates how cross-sectoral coordination, distributive equity, procedural inclusion, accountable finance, and knowledge pluralism can shape legitimacy and durability. Climate action is more likely to deliver sustained system-wide benefits when institutions align ecological interdependencies with social rights and responsibilities. Otherwise, promising interventions may remain partial, contested or short-lived.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117734first seen 2026-10-07 05:08:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。