← 論文一覧に戻る

気候変動の語られ方：収奪的・道具的・変革的モダリティ

Climate change articulations: Co-optive, instrumental, and transformative modalities (原題)

Aparna Parikh, Jamie Haverkamp, Karen Paiva Henrique, Idowu Mopelola Ajibade

Environment and Planning E Nature and Space📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-08#気候科学Origin: Global
DOI: 10.1177/25148486261491854
原典: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486261491854

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

気候変動が科学・政策・公共言説の中でいかに語られ、動員されてきたかを「収奪的」「道具的」「変革的」の三類型に整理する概念論文。気候交渉の弱体化と化石燃料回帰が進む中、言説が権力により構築・争奪され、資源配分や責任定義を左右すると論じる。気候の語りは単なる解釈ではなく、気候ガバナンスの政治経済を構成するものだと主張する。

English

A conceptual paper mapping how climate change is articulated across science, policy, and public discourse through three modalities: co-optive, instrumental, and transformative. Amid weakening climate negotiations and a return to fossil fuel extractivism, it argues these articulations are constructed and contested by powerful actors shaping priorities and responsibility. Climate articulations are constitutive of the political economy of climate governance, enabling either reproduced inequality or more just climate futures.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX政策やSSBJ開示の実務に直接資するものではないが、企業や政策が気候をどう「語るか」を相対化する視座を提供し、統合報告書のナラティブ設計やグリーンウォッシュ批判の理論的補助線になりうる。

In the global GX context

Speaks to the global disclosure debate by questioning how climate commitments are framed, offering a critical lens for greenwashing scrutiny and the credibility of corporate and national net-zero narratives under TCFD/ISSB regimes.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:気候ガバナンス研究における言説・権力分析の枠組みとして参照できる。

🏢実務担当者:自社の気候ナラティブが収奪的・道具的に読まれうる点を自省する材料になる。

🏛政策担当者:気候政策の言説が誰の利益を反映するかを点検する視点を提供する。

📄 Abstract（原文）

With the fracturing of the global order, and as climate negotiations and agreements are increasingly weakened, ignored, or strategically undermined by powerful nations, corporations, and geopolitical actors, we are witnessing a renewed and troubling return to fossil fuel extractivism at the center of global discourse. In this moment of regression and uncertainty, there is an urgent need to rethink not only climate policy but also how climate change itself has been articulated, understood, and mobilized over time. We show how a mapping of diverse climate articulations allows us to analytically consider the varied ways in which climate concerns manifest across science, policy, and public discourse. These articulations, which we identify as co-optive, instrumental, and transformative, are not neutral; they are constructed, contested, and deployed by actors with varying degrees of power to shape priorities, allocate resources, and define responsibility across scales. The analysis situates climate action within institutional logics, geopolitical hierarchies, and sociopolitical conditions to move beyond binaries and recognize the plurality of ways that climate is articulated, how it comes to matter, and the dynamic, unstable, and uneven ways these articulations materialize over time. We argue that climate articulations are not merely interpretive, but constitutive of the political economy of climate governance, thereby opening up possibilities for both the reproduction of existing inequalities and the emergence of transformative and more just climate futures oriented towards equity, accountability, and systemic change.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。