エネルギーコミュニティの集合的発展に向けて？加速化に関連する条件下でのエネルギーコミュニティ間の集合的発展の探究
Towards an Energy Community Collective? Exploring Collective Development Among Energy Communities Under Conditions Associated with Acceleration (原題)
Lynette A.M.H. Germes, Carina J. Wiekens, Henny van der Windt
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
オランダ・フローニンゲンの43のエネルギーコミュニティ（EC）の役員44名と中間支援者3名へのインタビューを通じ、集合的発展への意欲と能力を探った研究。ECは野心・地域密着性・組織能力・将来ビジョンの違いにより4類型に分かれ、集合的発展や共有戦略の形成を複雑化させることが示された。加速化条件下でECが取り得る複数の経路を提示し、ネットワーク形成を拡張する概念として「集合的発展」を提案する。
English
Interviewing 44 board members of 43 Dutch energy communities (ECs) and three intermediaries in Groningen, this study explores ECs' willingness and ability to pursue collective development. Four EC types emerged, differing in ambition, local embeddedness, organizational capacity and future vision—differences that complicate shared strategy formation. The authors propose collective development as an extension of network formation in sustainability transition research.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では地域新電力や自治体主導のエネルギーマネジメントが広がるが、地域コミュニティの組織能力や集合的ガバナンスの設計は未成熟。本稿の類型論は、地域脱炭素・再エネ地産地消の政策設計や地域金融連携を考える実務者に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As EU policy (RED II, Fit-for-55) accelerates energy community scale-up, this paper informs how grassroots actors can aggregate into collective structures—relevant to just-transition and community-energy provisions in global decarbonization policy debates.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー転換における集合的ガバナンスとネットワーク形成の理論的拡張に関心のある研究者に有用。
🏢実務担当者:地域エネルギー事業の連携・広域化を検討する事業者や自治体の組織設計に示唆。
🏛政策担当者:地域エネルギーコミュニティ支援策を設計する政策担当者に、多様性を踏まえた支援の必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
European policy ambitions and recent legislation have created new opportunities for energy communities (ECs) to expand their role in the energy transition. Such developments are often associated with acceleration processes. As ECs become more established, questions arise as to whether further development can be achieved by initiatives alone or whether it requires stronger forms of collective development. However, ECs often emphasize their local embeddedness. This study examines ECs’ perceived willingness and ability to contribute to collective development by exploring their sense of collectiveness, strategic visions, upscaling ambitions and perceived barriers. Based on interviews with 44 board members of 43 ECs and three intermediary representatives in Groningen, the Netherlands, four types of ECs were identified. Participating ECs differed substantially in their ambitions, orientations and involvement in collective development. Differences in ambitions, local embeddedness, organizational capacity, and future visions appear to complicate collective development and the emergence of a shared strategic vision. The findings indicate multiple pathways through which ECs may respond to conditions associated with acceleration. The study contributes to sustainability transition research by proposing collective development as an extension of network formation and highlighting how differences between ECs may shape their capacity and willingness to contribute to broader societal change.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su182110888first seen 2026-11-15 04:49:55
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。