Climate-smart Agriculture as a Systems Transition: Integrating Agroecology, Renewable Energy and Institutions for Sustainable and Climate-resilient Farming
システム転換としての気候スマート農業：アグロエコロジー、再生可能エネルギー、制度の統合による持続可能で気候レジリエントな農業 (AI 翻訳)
M. Karthik, S. Aarthi, K. B. Hazeera, G. Sathwik, N. H. Basha, K. Deepasri
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、気候スマート農業（CSA）を個別技術の寄せ集めではなく、アグロエコロジー、再生可能エネルギー、制度を統合したシステム転換として捉える必要性を論じる。文献レビューから、生態学的多様化と再生可能エネルギー導入は生産性と適応に寄与するが、水資源や土地所有権などの制度的管理が不可欠であると結論づけている。今後の研究には長期的・多地点での実証と制度評価が求められる。
English
This critical review argues that climate-smart agriculture should be viewed as a systems transition integrating agroecology, renewable energy, and institutions, rather than as isolated interventions. It finds that ecological diversification and renewable energy can enhance resilience and reduce emissions, but their success depends on institutional factors like resource rights and governance. The paper calls for long-term, multi-site research and institutional evaluations.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の農業分野では、みどりの食料システム戦略やカーボンニュートラル目標に関連し、農地での太陽光発電やバイオマス利用が注目されている。本論文の制度・ガバナンス重視の視点は、日本での農地転用や地域共生の課題を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to the discourse on climate-smart agriculture by emphasizing the need for integrated systems thinking, which is relevant to international frameworks like the Paris Agreement and SDGs. It highlights governance and equity issues that are often overlooked in technology-focused climate mitigation strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive framework for studying agricultural transitions, highlighting research gaps in long-term and institutional evaluations.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for designing integrated farming systems that combine ecological practices with renewable energy, but lacks specific implementation guidance.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the importance of institutional capacity and governance in enabling climate-smart agriculture, relevant for policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate-smart agriculture has become an influential framework for aligning agricultural productivity, adaptation and greenhouse-gas mitigation, yet its practical meaning remains contested because no technology is intrinsically climate-smart across all places, scales and social groups. This critical narrative review examines how agroecological design, renewable-energy deployment and institutional arrangements can be integrated into coherent farming-system transitions rather than promoted as disconnected interventions. Literature published mainly from 2010 to 30 May 2026 was identified through accessible scholarly indexes, institutional repositories, official scientific assessments and citation chaining, and was appraised for methodological quality, contextual relevance, treatment of trade-offs and evidence of durable outcomes. The synthesis indicates that agroecological diversification can strengthen soil functions, water regulation, biodiversity and livelihood buffering, although benefits are strongly conditioned by system design, transition duration, labour and knowledge demands, and access to biomass and land. Renewable energy can lower fossil-energy dependence and expand irrigation, processing and cold-chain services, but solar irrigation may accelerate groundwater depletion and agrivoltaics may reproduce land and tenure conflicts unless deployment is governed through water accounting, crop-sensitive design and benefit-sharing. Institutional capacity is therefore constitutive of climate-smartness: secure resource rights, trusted advisory systems, climate information, farmer organisations, coordinated finance, accountable markets and cross-sector policy determine who can adopt, sustain and benefit from technical change. The strongest pathway is not a universal package but a context-specific portfolio in which ecological redesign reduces exposure and input dependence, energy infrastructure removes productive bottlenecks, and institutions manage externalities, distribution and learning. Evidence remains weakened by short trials, inconsistent indicators, adoption-selection bias and sparse long-term distributional assessment. Future work should prioritise multi-site longitudinal experiments, causal institutional evaluations, whole-system water and carbon accounting, and governance designs that explicitly test equity and rebound risks.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2026/v16i85612first seen 2026-08-12 05:32:10
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。