クリーン開発移行のための国家能力構築
Building State Capacity for the Clean Development Transition (原題)
Hughes, Hunter
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
クリーンエネルギー・産業移行は市場修正ではなく国家能力の制度的危機と捉え、現代版「開発国家」の復活を提唱。調整評議会、開発銀行、産業補助金、SOE改革など12章にわたり制度設計を提示し、2026-2050年の戦略ロードマップを描く。
English
Frames the clean energy transition as an institutional crisis of state capacity, arguing for a modernized Developmental State with coordinated planning, strategic finance, and industrial discipline. Offers a 12-chapter architecture and a 2026-2050 roadmap for mission-oriented governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法やGX経済移行債など国家主導の移行が進むが、本稿は省庁横断調整や開発銀行の活用など制度設計の示唆を与える。SSBJ開示や有報対応を超えた政策インフラの議論として参考になる。
In the global GX context
Contributes to global debates on transition finance and industrial policy, complementing ISSB/CSRD disclosure with a state-capacity lens. Relevant for policymakers designing mission-oriented institutions for net-zero.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:国家能力と脱炭素移行の理論的枠組みを提供し、制度設計研究に示唆。
🏢実務担当者:政府関連プロジェクトや政策連動型ビジネスに携わる企業は、補助金・規制の方向性を理解する手掛かりに。
🏛政策担当者:省庁横断調整、開発銀行の資本増強、産業補助金の条件性など、具体的な政策設計の参考になる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
The clean energy and industrial transition represents a profound institutional challenge rather than a conventional market‑fixing exercise. As the document states, “The global clean energy and industrial transition is fundamentally an institutional crisis of state capacity.” Market‑conforming incentives, carbon pricing, and fragmented regulatory signals cannot resolve the systemic coordination failures inherent in deep decarbonization. Clean technology systems—spanning energy, transport, metallurgy, and urban infrastructure—are interdependent and require synchronized, multi‑sectoral capital deployment that private actors cannot achieve under short‑term financial constraints. The monograph argues for a modernized Developmental State capable of orchestrating structural transformation through embedded bureaucratic autonomy, mission‑oriented delivery units, and sovereign strategic finance. As the text emphasizes, “Successfully deploying multi-gigawatt clean infrastructure networks… demands the resurrection and modernization of the Developmental State.” This institutional model integrates high‑capacity planning commissions, empowered national development banks, disciplined industrial subsidies, and reformed state‑owned utilities. Across twelve analytical chapters, the work outlines a comprehensive architecture for clean state capacity: Administrative coherence via super‑ministerial Clean Coordination Councils Bureaucratic autonomy to prevent fossil regulatory capture Strategic finance through recapitalized national development banks Industrial discipline using reciprocal performance conditionalities SOE restructuring to manage stranded fossil assets Domestic value addition through mineral downstreaming and technology licensing Digital statecraft for procurement transparency and telemetry‑verified infrastructure Regulatory acceleration via spatial planning and unified permitting Just transition compacts for labor protection and regional diversification Fiscal space expansion through green tax reform and multilateral debt restructuring The monograph culminates in a 2026–2050 strategic roadmap detailing a sequenced, three‑horizon institutional transformation toward a fully autonomous, mission‑oriented developmental state capable of delivering national decarbonization, technological sovereignty, and long‑run macroeconomic convergence.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/22551777first seen 2026-09-07 04:12:34 · last seen 2026-09-20 04:11:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。