中国特有の持続可能な発展への道筋：論理・実践・世界的含意
China's Characteristic Pathway to Sustainable Development: Logic, Practice, and Global Implications (原題)
Jing Yu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、中国が「先に成長、後に浄化」モデルを採らず、国家主導の調整、カーボンニュートラル目標と産業・エネルギー構造転換の統合、民生志向の生態ガバナンスという三本柱で独自の持続可能な発展経路を築いたと論じる。世界的な持続可能な開発の変遷、中国の制度的実践、国際的含意の三側面から分析し、地域格差などの課題はあるものの、成長・資源制約・環境保全のトレードオフに直面する途上国に示唆を与えると主張する。
English
This paper argues China avoided a 'grow first, clean up later' model, forging an institution-driven sustainable development pathway built on state coordination, integration of carbon neutrality with industrial and energy restructuring, and people-oriented ecological governance. Examining global evolution, China's institutional practice, and international implications, it contends that despite regional imbalances, China's experience offers lessons for developing countries balancing growth, resource limits, and environmental stewardship.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の国家主導型GXガバナンスの論理を整理しており、日本のSSBJ対応や政策主導のトランジション設計を考える上で比較材料となる。ただし開示制度や企業実務への直接的な示唆は限定的。
In the global GX context
Provides a conceptual account of state-led green governance in China, useful as comparative context for global debates on transition pathways and policy-driven decarbonization, though it does not engage TCFD/ISSB/CSRD disclosure frameworks directly.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:国家主導の持続可能な発展モデルを比較政治経済・トランジション研究の枠組みで位置づける参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:中国市場に関わる企業が政策・規制環境の方向性を理解する補助資料になり得る。
🏛政策担当者:途上国の成長と環境のトレードオフを扱う政策設計の比較事例として参照可能。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Industrialization has boosted productivity and transformed wealth accumulation, but has also caused resource depletion, pollution, and ecological imbalances. Against this backdrop, sustainable development has evolved from an environmental concern into a global principle, as marked by milestones from the 1972 Stockholm Conference and the 1992 Rio Summit to the 2015 UN 2030 Agenda, through which the international community has reinforced the consensus that development must respect ecological carrying capacity and intergenerational equity. China, however, has not followed the "grow first, clean up later" model. Instead, given its vast population, pronounced regional disparities, and complex developmental stages, it has forged a distinctive institution-driven pathway anchored in three pillars: state-level coordination that translates green targets into enforceable governance; strategic integration of carbon neutrality goals with industrial upgrading and energy restructuring; and a people-oriented approach that links ecological governance to improved livelihoods. This paper examines this pathway from three dimensions—global evolution, China's institutional practices, and worldwide implications—to demonstrate its practical necessity and international relevance. It argues that despite challenges such as regional imbalances, China's experience offers valuable insights for developing countries navigating trade-offs between growth, resource limits, and environmental stewardship.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.62051/ijmsts.v5n4.01first seen 2026-09-12 04:59:05
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。