Climate Impact Assessment of Apayao State College: A Multi-Factor Analysis of Emissions, Energy, and Resource Management
アパヤオ州立大学の気候影響評価：排出、エネルギー、資源管理の多要素分析 (AI 翻訳)
AGUDA, MA. CRISTINA C., AQUINO, CLAIRE F.
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はフィリピンのアパヤオ州立大学を対象に、GHGプロトコルに基づく包括的な気候影響評価を実施。年間CO2排出量は196,405.63kgと推定され、電力(43.6%)、大学車両(31.4%)、ディーゼル発電機(23.1%)が主要排出源。廃棄物関連排出は1.9%だが、埋立廃棄物がメタン排出の大部分を占める。非効率な照明や空調の改善、再生可能エネルギーへの移行が提言されている。
English
This paper conducts a comprehensive climate impact assessment of Apayao State College in the Philippines using the GHG Protocol. Annual CO2 emissions are estimated at 196,405.63 kg, with electricity (43.6%), college vehicles (31.4%), and diesel generators (23.1%) as the main sources. Waste-related emissions are 1.9% but dominated by landfill methane. Recommendations include improving inefficient lighting, HVAC, and transitioning to renewable energy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の大学でもカーボンニュートラルに向けたキャンパス排出量算定が進む中、本論文は中小規模の教育機関における実践的な算出手法を示している。ただしフィリピン特有の電源構成（石炭火力比率）や廃棄物管理の課題が反映されており、そのまま日本に適用するには調整が必要。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a practical example of a university-level carbon footprint assessment using the GHG Protocol, relevant for campus sustainability programs globally. It highlights the importance of addressing electricity (especially coal-grid reliance) and waste management in institutional emissions. While specific to a Philippine context, the methodology can serve as a template for similar assessments in developing countries.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a replicable case study of inventory method for institutional carbon footprints; useful for comparative analysis of campus emissions.
🏢実務担当者:Provides a step-by-step emission inventory approach and identifies key reduction levers (energy efficiency, fuel switching) for campus sustainability teams.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study conducted a comprehensive climate impact assessment of Apayao State College (ASC) to evaluate its carbon footprint and identify key emission sources across electricity consumption, diesel generators, transportation, and waste management. Using the GHG Protocol methodology, the research quantified annual CO ₂ emissions at 196,405.63 kg , with electricity (43.6%), college vehicles (31.4%), and diesel generators (23.1%) as the dominant contributors. Waste generation accounted for 1.9% of emissions, though landfill-bound residual waste represented 77.5% of waste-related emissions due to high methane potential. The analysis revealed critical inefficiencies, including reliance on coal-powered grid electricity (85,687 kg CO ₂ e/year), inconsistent generator use (45,329 kg CO ₂ e/year), and underoptimized vehicle fleets (61,623 kg CO ₂ e/year). Infrastructure audits highlighted energy waste from 499 non-functional lights and 71 air conditioning units in high-consumption buildings. The study underscores ASC’s role as a sustainability leader in the Cordillera region, demonstrating how institutional reforms, community engagement, and clean energy transitions can yield both environmental and financial benefits. Keywords : carbon footprint, sustainable campus, emission reduction, renewable energy, waste management
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/20546298first seen 2026-06-05 04:15:40 · last seen 2026-06-07 04:14:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。