The Mechanism of Deduction of the Paid Carbon Price in the EU Cross-Border Carbon Regulation Mechanism: Political Effects and Institutional Conflicts
EU国境炭素調整メカニズムにおける既支払炭素価格控除のメカニズム：政治的効果と制度的対立 (AI 翻訳)
Natalia V. Mikhailova, Vladislav B. Levshenkov
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿はEUの国境炭素調整メカニズム（CBAM）における既支払炭素価格控除の政治的効果と制度的対立を分析。EU規制の域外影響力と、第三国の制度収斂・対立の二つの傾向を明らかにする。検証インフラの非対称性とグローバル気候ガバナンスの断片化リスクに言及。
English
This article analyzes the political effects and institutional conflicts of the deduction of paid carbon price under the EU CBAM, revealing EU's extraterritorial influence and two trends: institutional convergence of some third countries and intensifying conflicts with others. It highlights risks of regulatory asymmetry and fragmentation in global climate governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業にとって、EUへの輸出時にCBAMが適用される可能性があり、本稿が指摘する控除メカニズムの政治性は実務上の注意点となる。日本のカーボンプライシング制度設計にも示唆がある。
In the global GX context
This paper is crucial for understanding CBAM's political dimensions beyond technical compliance. It informs global debates on carbon border adjustments, especially for countries like Japan that may face CBAM and are designing their own carbon pricing.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a political-institutional lens on CBAM's deduction mechanism, relevant for scholars of climate policy and trade.
🏢実務担当者:Japanese exporters to the EU should note the political risks and verification requirements of CBAM's carbon price deduction.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers designing carbon pricing should consider CBAM's extraterritorial effects and potential for institutional conflict.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article examines the political effects and institutional conflicts associated with the mechanism for deducting the carbon price already paid within the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Based on Regulation (EU) 2023/956 and the amendments introduced by Regulation (EU) 2025/2083, the study shows that this mechanism extends beyond a compensatory function and serves as an instrument of the EU’s extraterritorial regulatory influence on third countries. The article identifies two interrelated tendencies: the institutional convergence of some third countries with the European model of carbon regulation and the intensification of institutional conflicts with states that perceive the CBAM as a form of external pressure. Particular attention is paid to the EU’s verification infrastructure and the related risks of regulatory asymmetry and fragmentation in global climate governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2026.4.1first seen 2026-06-08 04:44:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。