オーストラリア東岸ガス市場の複雑性と失敗
The complexities and failures of Australia’s East Coast Gas Market (原題)
Amanda Nicole Williams
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
豪州東岸ガス市場は豊富な埋蔵量にもかかわらず家計・企業が高いエネルギーコストに苦しむ政策パラドックスにある。本稿は「供給増で価格が下がる」「再エネはガスなしでは不安定」「政府介入で市場問題は是正可能」という3つの言説を検証し、これらが相互補強しながら輸出志向のガス市場を維持し、構造的介入の政治的余地を狭めていると論じる。市場構造と政治的フレーミングの相互作用が国内エネルギーガバナンスを制約し、化石燃料輸出国のエネルギー移行を複雑化することを示す。
English
Australia's East Coast Gas Market faces a policy paradox: abundant reserves yet persistently high energy costs. This Perspective examines three recurring claims—that more supply lowers prices, that renewables need gas backup, and that regulation can fix market problems—arguing they reinforce each other to sustain an export-oriented market and narrow political space for structural intervention. It shows how market structure and political framing jointly constrain domestic energy governance and complicate transition in fossil-fuel-exporting economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はLNG輸入の大半を豪州に依存しており、東岸ガス市場の輸出志向と価格形成の政治力学は日本の調達リスク・エネルギー安全保障に直結する。資源輸出国における移行政策の制約は、日本のGX戦略における調達多角化やLNG契約戦略を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
For global disclosure scholarship, this paper illustrates how political framing shapes transition risk in fossil-fuel-exporting economies—relevant to ISSB/TCFD transition-plan disclosure and to investors assessing sovereign and corporate transition credibility in resource exporters. It adds a political-economy lens to the energy-transition literature that disclosure frameworks often underweight.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:市場構造と政治的言説の相互作用が移行をどう制約するかを分析する枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:豪州LNG調達に依存する企業は、価格・供給の政治的要因を調達リスク評価に組み込むべき。
🏛政策担当者:資源輸出国における構造的介入の政治的制約を理解し、調達多角化や二国間エネルギー対話に活かせる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Australia's East Coast Gas Market (ECGM) presents a policy paradox. Despite abundant gas reserves, households, businesses and industry continue to face high energy costs. These outcomes are commonly linked to the ECGM's integration with the international gas and oil markets. However, market structure alone does not explain why more structural forms of regulatory intervention remain politically constrained. This Perspective examines three recurring claims in Australia's gas policy debate: that increasing gas supply will lower domestic prices, that renewable energy is unreliable without continued reliance on gas, and that government intervention can correct problems within the gas market. Existing research has raised questions about each of these propositions. This paper, therefore, focuses on the political work they perform and argues that the claims circulate and reinforce one another by sustaining increased gas supply in response to affordability concerns, positioning gas as necessary for energy reliability, and providing reassurances that market problems can be managed through regulation. In doing so, they help to maintain an export-oriented gas market while narrowing the political space for structural intervention. The analysis highlights how market structure and political framing interact to constrain domestic energy governance and complicate energy transition in fossil-fuel-exporting economies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115686first seen 2026-11-03 04:40:45 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:34:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。