小規模コミュニティの低炭素経路：多次元フレームワークと村落規模での実証
Low-carbon pathways for small communities: A multidimensional framework and a village-scale demonstration (原題)
S. Bituila, Abhijeet Anand, Rangan Banerjee, Priyanka Kaushal
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
世界人口の約43%を占める小規模コミュニティは、都市中心の脱炭素枠組みから取り残されてきた。本研究はGHGインベントリとdMRV、部門別緩和ロードマップ、炭素市場統合、能力構築、ガバナンス、公正移行の6本柱からなる統合フレームワークを構築し、インドのチリヤプル村で実証した。IPCC Tier-1でベースライン排出3178 tCO2e/年を推計し、バイオガス・熱分解・屋上太陽光・レンガ窯転換により約48%削減、回収期間3.7年、年間約9.93万ドルの収益・節約を試算した。
English
Small communities hold ~43% of global population yet are underrepresented in urban-centric decarbonization frameworks. This study builds a six-pillar framework (GHG inventory/dMRV, sectoral roadmaps, carbon-market finance, capacity building, governance, just transition) and demonstrates it in Chiryapur Village, India. Baseline emissions of 3,178 tCO2e/yr were estimated via IPCC Tier-1; a two-phase pathway (biogas, pyrolysis, rooftop solar, brick-kiln conversion) cuts emissions ~48% with a 3.7-year payback and ~$99,300 annual revenue/savings.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では過疎地域・離島の脱炭素先行地域や地域新電力の文脈に接続しうる。dMRVや炭素市場統合の設計は、自治体レベルのScope把握や地域カーボンクレジット制度を検討する国内実務者に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Adds a community-scale, non-urban perspective to global decarbonization and disclosure scholarship, where frameworks (TCFD/ISSB, CSRD) remain largely corporate and urban. The dMRV and carbon-market pillars speak to emerging MRV infrastructure for sub-national actors and just-transition finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:村落規模の脱炭素フレームワーク設計とdMRV・炭素市場統合の実証手法を学べる。
🏢実務担当者:地域・サプライチェーン上流の小規模コミュニティ向け低炭素投資の回収期間と収益モデルの参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:過疎地域や離島の脱炭素政策、地域カーボンクレジットや公正移行設計の枠組みとして参照可能。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Small communities account for approximately 43% of the global population. Yet they remain underrepresented in operational decarbonization frameworks. Existing frameworks are predominantly urban-centric, sector-specific, and conceptual, lacking community-level validation and a coherent rationale for initiating decarbonization in small communities. This study develops an integrated framework structured around six interconnected pillars: (1) GHG inventory and digital monitoring, reporting, and verification (dMRV) systems; (2) sectoral mitigation roadmaps; (3) financing and carbon market integration; (4) capacity building and inclusion; (5) governance and institutional coordination; and (6) just transition safeguards. The steps for inventory, resource assessment, and pathway design under the developed framework have been demonstrated through a case study of Chiryapur Village, a displaced tribal community located in the Indo-Gangetic Plain of India. Using IPCC Tier-1 methodology and AR5 GWP 100 values, baseline emissions were estimated at 3178 tCO 2 e/year, with the energy sector as the largest contributor (50.8%), followed by AFOLU (35.7%), waste (11.0%), and IPPU (2.5%). A two-phase low-carbon pathway that includes community-scale biogas production, pyrolysis, rooftop solar, and the conversion of a vertical-shaft brick kiln was assessed to reduce/eliminate fossil fuel use. The analyzed pathway could reduce community baseline emissions by approximately 48%, directly supporting SDG7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG11 (sustainable cities and communities). With a combined payback period of 3.7 years, the proposed intervention would generate about $99,300 in annual revenue and savings. This case study demonstrates the practical application of the inventory, resource assessment, and modeled pathway in a single village and presents an evidence-based pathway for accelerating decarbonization in small communities. However, the wider applicability of the proposed framework would require multi-site implementation and evaluation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2026.102161first seen 2026-10-13 04:38:19
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。