Full-Spectrum Human Climate Stabilization Portfolio: Evidence-Bounded Architecture for Mitigation, Carbon Protection, Carbon Removal, Adaptation, and Governance
全スペクトラム人間気候安定化ポートフォリオ:緩和、炭素保護、炭素除去、適応、ガバナンスのためのエビデンスに基づくアーキテクチャ (AI 翻訳)
QianJun Yu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、直接空気回収(DAC)を最小化する視点から拡張した、全スペクトラムの気候安定化アーキテクチャを提示する。排出回避、炭素ストック保護、生物学的・工学的除去、適応、緊急ガバナンスを厳密に区分し、二重計上を防止する。バージョン1.1では、文明レベルの意思決定アーキテクチャとしての位置づけを明確化した。
English
This document presents a full-spectrum human climate stabilization architecture that expands beyond a Direct Air Capture minimization frame. It organizes climate action into strict accounting categories: avoided emissions, protected carbon stocks, biological and engineered carbon removal, adaptation, and emergency governance, reducing double counting. Version 1.1 clarifies its role as a civilization-level decision architecture, not a one-size-fits-all blueprint.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では2020年の「2050年カーボンニュートラル」宣言以降、炭素会計や除去技術の位置づけが重要になっている。本フレームワークは、日本のGX政策におけるカーボンクレジットの二重計上防止や、DACの役割再考に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, as net-zero targets proliferate and carbon removal gains traction, this framework offers a rigorous accounting structure to avoid double counting and clarify the role of various mitigation strategies. It aligns with ISSB and TCFD principles by emphasizing transparent categorization of climate actions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive taxonomy for climate stabilization research, useful for structuring studies on mitigation, removal, and adaptation.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a clear accounting framework for companies developing net-zero strategies, helping to categorize actions and avoid double counting in carbon footprints.
🏛政策担当者:Presents a governance architecture that can inform national climate plans, particularly in defining the roles of carbon removal and adaptation.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This document presents a full-spectrum human climate stabilization architecture that expands beyond a Direct Air Capture minimization frame. It organizes climate action into strict accounting categories: avoided future emissions, protected existing carbon stocks, biological carbon removal, durable engineered and mineral carbon removal, adaptation and damage reduction, and emergency climate-risk governance. The framework demotes DAC from the organizing center of climate strategy to a residual cleanup function for hard-to-abate emissions and possible overshoot reversal. It also separates legacy atmospheric stock, remaining carbon budget, avoided emissions, protected stocks, carbon removal, and adaptation effects to reduce double counting and unsupported claims. Version 1.1 adds a "How to Use This Document" section that clarifies the document's role as a civilization-level decision architecture rather than a one-size-fits-all project blueprint. Specific realization plans should be derived locally by governments, regions, cities, institutions, companies, investors, and communities according to their geography, energy mix, capital, law, public consent, and risk exposure.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20319657first seen 2026-06-08 04:44:20 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:40:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。