CC(U)Sの準備態勢を評価する：我々はそこに到達しているのか？
Assessing readiness for CC(U)S: are we there yet? (原題)
Peta Ashworth, Bishal Bharadwaj, Richard Norman
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
7カ国・7,264人を対象とした離散選択実験により、CCSプロジェクトに対する一般市民の選好を分析した研究。全回答者は低コストでCO2回収量が最大化されるプロジェクトを好み、CO2を地元に貯留するプロジェクトは選好されにくい傾向が各国共通で見られた。国別の差は小さく、CCSの主流化には地域コミュニティへの丁寧な情報発信と、補助金依存を避ける資金調達設計が不可欠だと結論づけている。
English
A discrete choice experiment across seven countries (N=7,264) examines public preferences for CCS project attributes. Respondents consistently favored projects maximizing CO2 captured at lowest cost and were less likely to choose projects storing CO2 locally, with only small cross-country differences. The authors argue CCS mainstreaming requires nuanced community engagement and financing designs that avoid burdening the public through subsidies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではCCSはGX推進戦略・エネルギー基本計画で重要技術と位置づけられ、苫小牧の実証やJOGMEC主導の適地調査が進む。本稿は地域受容性と費用負担の論点を国際比較で示し、国内CCS事業の社会合意形成や補助金設計を検討する実務者・政策担当者に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As CCUS becomes central to net-zero pathways under ISSB-aligned transition planning and national decarbonization strategies, public acceptance is a binding constraint on project finance and permitting. This multi-country evidence on cost-benefit preferences and local storage aversion informs how developers and regulators design engagement and subsidy schemes globally.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CCSの社会受容性を属性ベースの選好分析で捉える枠組みと7カ国比較データを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:CCS事業者は地域貯留への抵抗と費用便益の見える化を前提に、コミュニケーションと資金調達計画を設計すべき。
🏛政策担当者:CCS補助金が国民負担とならない制度設計と、地域合意形成プロセスの整備が政策課題であることを示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Given the slow progress on climate mitigation across the world, the need for carbon capture and storage (CCS) to reduce carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions is being increasingly discussed across society. However, the public remains ignorant of CCS and the role it may play in reducing CO 2 emissions. This means responses to CCS projects can be reactionary rather than based on knowledge of CCS project attributes. To overcome this gap, we used a Discrete Choice Experiment, to investigate: (i) under what conditions do individuals choose a CCS project (or not)? and (ii) what are the attributes that influence preferences for the different forms of CCS? This was seen as a way to address the shortfall of previous public perception research by focusing on the different attributes of CCS projects. We used a market research company to conduct an online survey across seven countries (N=7264) including Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Denmark, Brazil and Indonesia. While there were small differences in preferences across countries, all respondents preferred projects that showed higher benefits - maximising the CO 2 captured for the lowest cost. The other finding was that respondents were less likely to choose projects storing CO 2 locally. These three findings highlight the areas that require most attention for communicating and engaging communities for local CCS projects. While not insurmountable, there is a need to ensure financing CCS projects do not become a burden on the public through subsidies. A more nuanced approach is required to ensure CCS becomes mainstreamed into global mitigation strategies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2026.104797first seen 2026-10-17 04:40:00
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。