Toward Circular Carbon Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (BECCUS)
循環炭素システムに向けて：バイオエネルギーと炭素回収・有効利用・貯蔵（BECCUS）の包括的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Lina Wang, Nianci Lu, Meng Qi, Rudi Pankratz Nielsen, Haoshui Yu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、循環炭素システムの観点からBECCUSを包括的に検討する。BECCS、BECCU、BECCUSの定義を明確にし、吸収、吸着、膜分離などの炭素回収技術や、地中貯留、鉱物化、燃料転換などの利用・貯蔵経路を比較する。文献計量分析により研究動向を示し、経済性や政策要件も議論する。持続可能なバイオマス供給とライフサイクル排出管理の重要性を指摘する。
English
This comprehensive review examines BECCUS from a circular carbon system perspective, distinguishing BECCS, BECCU, and BECCUS. It compares carbon capture technologies (absorption, adsorption, membrane, etc.) and utilization/storage pathways (geological storage, mineralization, fuels, etc.) regarding readiness, potential, and economy. A bibliometric analysis identifies research trends. The study emphasizes that climate benefits depend on sustainable biomass, lifecycle emissions, and consistent accounting.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は2030年以降のCCUS導入を検討しており、バイオマスとの組み合わせ（BECCUS）は電力・産業部門のカーボンネガティブ達成に寄与し得る。本レビューは技術選択や政策設計の基礎資料として有用。
In the global GX context
As global frameworks like ISSB and TCFD emphasize climate transition pathways, this review provides a structured comparison of carbon removal options. It clarifies terminological differences (BECCS vs. BECCU) critical for consistent disclosure and net-zero target setting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic, bibliometric review of BECCUS technologies and pathways, useful for identifying research gaps and emerging trends.
🏢実務担当者:Helps evaluate the feasibility and trade-offs of BECCUS for corporate decarbonization strategies and carbon credit generation.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policy design for carbon removal credits, infrastructure planning, and sustainability criteria for biomass supply.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Bioenergy with carbon capture, utilization, and storage (BECCUS) is increasingly regarded as a potential pathway to achieve net-negative emissions and support deep decarbonization. This review examines BECCUS from the perspective of circular carbon systems by integrating biomass resources, bioenergy conversion, carbon capture technologies, storage and utilization pathways, economic feasibility, sustainability challenges, and policy requirements. To improve conceptual clarity, the review distinguishes among BECCS, BECCU, and BECCUS based on carbon retention time, lifecycle boundaries, and final product fate. Recent advances in carbon capture technologies, including absorption, adsorption, membrane separation, chemical looping, cryogenic separation, direct air capture, and hybrid systems, are reviewed with particular attention to biomass-based applications. Major utilization and storage pathways are also critically assessed, including geological storage, CO2-enhanced recovery, cement mineralization, CO2-to-chemicals, CO2-to-fuels, microalgae-based conversion, and agricultural CO2 utilization. These pathways are compared in terms of technology readiness, mitigation potential, permanence, energy demand, economic feasibility, and major limitations. A bibliometric analysis is further included to identify research hotspots and emerging trends. Overall, BECCUS is a promising but highly pathway-dependent option whose climate benefits depend on sustainable biomass supply, lifecycle emissions, low-carbon hydrogen, infrastructure availability, and consistent carbon accounting.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14142297first seen 2026-07-17 05:04:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。