Bridging research and practice in circular biobased construction: a scoping review and stakeholder perspectives
循環型バイオベース建築における研究と実践の橋渡し：スコーピングレビューとステークホルダーの視点 (AI 翻訳)
T. Tsui, Mingming Hu, Stefano Cucurachi, Nils Thonemann
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究は、循環型バイオベース建築における環境アセスメント研究と実務者のニーズの一致・乖離を分析したものです。4回のワークショップで建築関係者の課題を抽出し、189件の論文をスコーピングレビューで分類。材料入手性や環境影響では一致が見られた一方、サプライチェーン、設計、土地利用、社会的側面に大きなギャップがあることを明らかにしました。これらのギャップを埋める研究アジェンダを提案し、政策や産業の意思決定を支援します。
English
This study examines the alignment between environmental assessment research and practitioner needs in circular biobased construction. Through workshops with AEC stakeholders and a scoping review of 189 papers, it identifies strong alignment on material availability and environmental impacts, but major gaps in supply chains, design, land use, and societal dimensions. The findings provide a structured research agenda to support more actionable assessments for policy and industry.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では建設分野の脱炭素化が急務であり、特に木材利用やバイオマス活用が注目されています。本論文は、研究と実務のギャップを可視化することで、日本の建設業界が循環型建築を進める上で優先すべき領域を示唆しています。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a systematic comparison of research and practice in circular biobased construction, a key area for reducing embodied emissions globally. Its identified gaps—especially in supply chains and land use—provide actionable insights for aligning academic work with industry needs under frameworks like the circular economy and net-zero targets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This study maps the research landscape and identifies underexplored areas such as supply chain and societal dimensions, guiding future research directions.
🏢実務担当者:Practitioners can use the gap analysis to prioritize areas where academic support is lacking and advocate for more relevant studies.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can reference the research agenda to allocate funding toward high-impact areas that bridge research and practice.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The transition to a circular and biobased built environment offers major potential to reduce embodied greenhouse gas emissions, yet the extent to which environmental assessment research addresses practitioner needs remains unclear. This study examines the alignment and divergence between academic work and industry priorities in circular biobased construction. We combined two approaches: (1) four workshops with architecture, engineering, and construction stakeholders to identify key questions and concerns, and (2) a scoping review of 189 academic papers, categorized with a multi-dimensional taxonomy and clustered using k-medoids. The workshops highlighted six overarching themes: material availability, land use, supply chains, design, environmental impacts, and political and cultural shifts. The literature clustered mainly around four scales: (1) materials and products, (2) buildings, (3) building stock, and (4) regional planning. While strong alignment emerged around material availability and environmental impacts, major gaps remain in supply chains, design, land use, and societal dimensions. Addressing these gaps can guide more actionable assessments for policy and industry. These findings inform a research agenda that advances theoretical understanding of how environmental assessment research engages with circular biobased construction, while also identifying priority areas where further work is needed to support decision-making in practice. This study systematically compares environmental assessment research on circular biobased construction with practitioner concerns. By translating research–practice misalignments into a structured research agenda, it provides an evidence-based foundation for more actionable assessments that better support policy and industry decision-making.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-11-2025-0721first seen 2026-05-05 22:23:24
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。