Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs in Carbon Footprint Reduction Strategies: A Farm-Level Optimization Model for Intensive Crop Production
炭素フットプリント削減戦略における経済と環境のトレードオフ:集約的作物生産の農場レベル最適化モデル (AI 翻訳)
Simona Roxana Pătărlăgeanu, Mihai Dinu, Luxița Rîșnoveanu, Alina Florentina Gheorghe, Andreea Pătărlăgeanu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ルーマニアの300haモデル農場を対象に、多目的ゴールプログラミングとLCAを組み合わせ、炭素フットプリントと生産性を同時最適化する作物・管理手法の組み合わせを特定。最適構成でほぼゼロ炭素(0.33tCO2eq)を達成しつつ、窒素投入をEU硝酸塩指令の35.7%に削減、水使用を48%節約。ただし生産量は最大目標比52.9%減となり、気候目標と食料安全保障のパレート最適な対立を示す。経済的同等性には110-165ユーロ/ha/年の政策支援が必要。
English
A multi-objective Goal Programming model combined with LCA optimizes crop mix and management for a 300-ha Romanian farm, achieving near-zero carbon (0.33 tCO2eq) while cutting nitrogen inputs to 35.7% of the EU Nitrates Directive limit and saving 48% water. However, production drops 52.9% versus the maximum target, revealing a Pareto-optimal conflict between climate and food security. Policy support of 110-165 EUR/ha/year is needed for economic parity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の農業分野では、みどりの食料システム戦略やカーボンニュートラル目標に資する。農家の経営と環境負荷のトレードオフを定量化する手法は、国内のスマート農業や環境直接支払い制度の設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This study provides a replicable optimization framework for balancing agricultural productivity and carbon reduction, relevant to the EU's Green Deal and global climate targets. It offers evidence on the need for policy support to offset production losses, informing agricultural climate policy design worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel farm-level optimization model integrating LCA and multi-objective programming, useful for agricultural systems analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into optimizing crop mixes for lower carbon footprints, though the production trade-off requires careful consideration.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for financial support mechanisms to enable farmers to adopt low-carbon practices without compromising food security.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Intensive agricultural production contributes significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for between 10 and 12% of global anthropogenic emissions, at a time when the agricultural sector is facing increasing pressure to adapt to ever-stricter environmental regulations. This study develops and applies a multi-objective Goal Programming model to identify the optimal mix of crops and management practices that simultaneously minimize the carbon footprint and maximize productivity, at the level of a 300-hectare (ha) model agricultural system in Romania. The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 standards and Ecoinvent 3.8 emission factors, was applied to nine crops distributed across three soil types, within four management scenarios, over an annual planning horizon. The unit of measurement used is a ton of CO2 equivalent per agricultural system. The results show that the optimized configuration achieves near-zero total carbon emissions (0.33 t CO2eq for the entire farm), reduces synthetic nitrogen inputs to 35.7% of the limit set by the EU Nitrates Directive, and generates water savings of 48%. However, these environmental gains entail a 52.9% production trade-off relative to the maximum target of 3000 tons, highlighting a Pareto-optimal structural conflict between climate and food security objectives. The sensitivity analysis identifies the nitrogen emission factor and crop yield as the most influential parameters. The results confirm the technical feasibility of the European Green Deal targets through systematic mathematical optimization, while also demonstrating that achieving economic parity requires policy support of 110–165 EUR/ha/year.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16101095first seen 2026-05-20 05:03:48 · last seen 2026-06-15 04:52:11
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。