Innovative strategic management toolkit of renewable energy sources enterprises in conditions of military uncertainty
軍事的不確実性下における再生可能エネルギー企業の革新的戦略管理ツールキット (AI 翻訳)
L. Ligonenko, V. Stetsiura
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、軍事紛争とエネルギー転換による極度の変動性下で、再生可能エネルギー企業の戦略策定・適応・改善のための科学的・方法論的アプローチを開発する。PESTEL、ポーターの五力、VRIO、アンゾフ行列、動的シナリオ分析を統合し、「戦略的優位性の逆転」現象を実証。従来の規模の経済や集中型資産が脆弱性に転じ、分散型電源やBESSが生存要因となることを示す。伝統的な硬直的計画モデルに代わり、リアルオプション理論に基づく「戦略的オプションのポートフォリオ」を提唱し、企業タイプ別の提言と国家規制への示唆を提供する。
English
This paper develops a comprehensive strategic management approach for renewable energy enterprises under extreme volatility from military conflict and energy transition. Integrating PESTEL, Porter's Five Forces, VRIO, Ansoff, and dynamic scenario analysis, it demonstrates 'strategic advantage inversion' where traditional strengths become vulnerabilities and distributed generation and BESS become critical. It advocates a 'portfolio of strategic options' based on real options theory, offering differentiated recommendations for enterprise clusters and macro-level policy suggestions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、エネルギー安全保障と再生可能エネルギー拡大の文脈で、紛争下の戦略的柔軟性や分散型電源の重要性が示唆に富む。特に、BESSやマイクログリッドの戦略的価値は、日本のレジリエンス強化やSSBJ開示におけるリスク管理にも関連する。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to transition finance and climate resilience literature by empirically linking strategic management theory to renewable energy under extreme uncertainty. Its insights on strategic flexibility and blended finance are relevant for ISSB/CSRD disclosure on resilience and for investors assessing energy firms in volatile regions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Strategic management scholars can use the 'strategic advantage inversion' concept and real options framework for further empirical testing in other conflict or crisis contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can apply the portfolio of strategic options approach to enhance resilience planning and align with disclosure requirements on risk management.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can note the proposed CfD and blended finance mechanisms to support renewable investment in high-risk environments.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This article develops a comprehensive scientific and methodological approach to formulating, adapting, and improving corporate strategies for renewable energy sources (RES) enterprises operating amid extreme volatility driven by ongoing military conflict and profound global energy transitions. The research rigorously integrates multiple strategic frameworks, including an extended PESTEL analysis, an adapted Porter’s Five Forces model, a resource-based view (VRIO framework), the Ansoff growth matrix, and dynamic scenario modeling. The study identifies a fundamental “strategic paradox” within the Ukrainian national energy market: the simultaneous existence of hyper-ambitious long-term developmental goals (National Energy Strategy up to 2050 targeting transformation into Europe’s primary green energy hub with up to 140 GW of wind and 94 GW of solar capacity, requiring approximately $383 billion in investments) and critical, existential short-term risks stemming from systematic kinetic destruction of power infrastructure and high macroeconomic instability. Through advanced dynamic scenario analysis, the research substantiates the phenomenon of “strategic advantage inversion.” This paradigm shift reveals that traditional competitive strengths— such as massive economies of scale, heavy capital concentration, and highly centralized generating assets—rapidly morph into critical operational and financial vulnerabilities in prolonged conflict scenarios. Conversely, previously niche attributes such as deep technological expertise in microgrids and distributed generation, organizational agility, and the deployment of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) are emerging as mission-critical survival factors. The study demonstrates the inherent inefficiency of traditional, rigid, deterministic strategic planning models and advocates a paradigm shift toward the “portfolio of strategic options” concept, rooted in real options theory. This approach operationalizes strategic flexibility and corporate antifragility, enabling energy firms to initiate multiple low-sunk-cost strategic pathways that can be dynamically scaled, paused, or abandoned as scenarios unfold. The paper provides differentiated actionable recommendations tailored to three empirically identified clusters of RES enterprises: “Strategic Leaders,” “Stabilizers,” and “Outsiders.” For market leaders, recommendations emphasize deployment of novel Energy-as-a-Service (EaaS) B2B business models, financial securitization of corporate Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) portfolios, and rapid geographic asset diversification paired with industrial-scale BESS. For international stabilizers, the focus is on creating strategic joint ventures with local leaders, targeting niche fast-payback infrastructure projects, and ensuring alignment with international war-risk insurance programs (MIGA and DFC). For outsiders, survival strategies dictate urgent asset recovery through equity partnerships and pilot transition toward free-market trading. Finally, the study synthesizes systemic recommendations for macro-level state regulation to address critical market gaps through standardized Contracts for Difference (CfD), long-term capacity reserve auctions, and innovative blended-finance architectures designed to catalyze post-war green reconstruction and ensure the long-term resilience of the national grid. Keywords: renewable energy, strategic management, strategic advantage inversion, portfolio of strategic options, antifragility, battery energy storage systems, corporate PPAs, blended finance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-2-48first seen 2026-06-12 05:56:12 · last seen 2026-07-29 05:44:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。