Energy Security and Green Transition in Times of Economic Turmoil: Comparative Insights from Romania and Spain
経済混乱期におけるエネルギー安全保障とグリーン移行：ルーマニアとスペインの比較洞察 (AI 翻訳)
Andreea Maria Mănescu, Victoria Barcenas Tous
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2010～2024年の経済混乱下で、ルーマニアとスペインがエネルギー安全保障と脱炭素化をどう両立させたかを比較。スペインは風力・太陽光の急速な普及で炭素強度を低減したが、ガス価格高騰の影響を受けやすかった。ルーマニアは原子力・水力によりショックを緩和したが再生可能エネルギー導入が遅れ、化石燃料依存の炭素強度が高い。投資規模と規制の予見可能性が両国の差異を生み、EU内での画一的な解決策に警鐘を鳴らす。
English
This study compares how Romania and Spain balanced energy security and decarbonization under economic turmoil from 2010 to 2024. Spain's rapid wind and solar expansion lowered carbon intensity but increased exposure to gas price spikes. Romania's nuclear and hydro backbone buffered shocks but slowed renewable uptake and maintained higher carbon intensity. Divergence is linked to investment scale and regulatory predictability, cautioning against one-size-fits-all EU solutions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本においてもエネルギー安全保障と脱炭素化の両立は重要課題であり、欧州の事例は投資規模や規制の一貫性の重要性を示唆。特に再生可能エネルギー導入の加速と安定供給のバランスを考える上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comparative analysis within the EU, highlighting how different energy mixes and policy frameworks affect the green transition under economic stress. It underscores the need for tailored strategies rather than uniform approaches, relevant for global discussions on energy security and decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The comparative methodology and empirical indicators (import dependency, carbon intensity, renewable deployment) offer a template for cross-country analysis of energy transitions.
🏢実務担当者:Energy utilities and investors can glean insights on the risks and opportunities of different energy portfolios, especially regarding gas exposure and renewable investment.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can learn from Spain's price volatility issues and Romania's slower renewables uptake, informing regulatory frameworks that balance security and decarbonization.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study compares how Romania and Spain balance energy security and decarbonization under sustained economic turbulence (2010–2024). Using harmonized indicators from Eurostat, the IEA and the World Bank, we quantify energy import dependency, electricity prices, carbon intensity, renewable deployment and investment patterns, and read these trends against EU policy frameworks (European Green Deal, REPowerEU). Descriptive evidence shows that Spain’s rapid wind–solar expansion substantially lowered carbon intensity, while the country remained more exposed to gas-driven price surges in 2022–2023. Romania’s nuclear–hydro backbone buffered shocks and import exposure, yet coincided with slower renewable uptake and persistently higher carbon intensity in fossil-based segments. Divergence is most closely associated with investment scale and regulatory predictability. Policy implications are twofold: Spain would benefit from additional firm capacity and market-design adjustments to dampen price volatility without diluting ambition; Romania should accelerate grid modernization and mobilize private capital to unlock its renewable potential. The comparative lens highlights actionable complementarities and cautions against one-size-fits-all solutions in the EU.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.24818/rej/2025/91/11first seen 2026-05-15 19:58:45
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。