炭素回収プロセスにおける再生可能・低炭素・回収エネルギーの統合
Renewable, Low-Carbon and Recovered Energy Integration in Carbon-Capture Processes (原題)
Mauro Capocelli, Marco Facchino, Cecilia Pistolesi, Erika Ballini, Marcello De Falco
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、炭素回収プロセスの分離・再生・圧縮・冷却に要するエネルギーを低炭素化するため、再生可能熱（RH-CC）、再生可能電力（RE-CC）、再生可能・回収冷熱（CR-CC）の3経路を整理した。間接太陽熱や高温ヒートポンプ、MVR、液体空気エネルギー貯蔵などが有望とされるが、資源品質や時間的マッチング、サイト固有の電力炭素強度に依存する。
English
This review classifies low-carbon and renewable energy integration into carbon capture via renewable heat (RH-CC), renewable electricity (RE-CC), and renewable/recovered cryogenic energy (CR-CC). Indirect solar heat, high-temperature heat pumps, MVR, and liquid-air energy storage show near-term promise, but full deployment depends on resource quality, temporal matching, host-process integration, and site-specific grid carbon intensity.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はCCS/CCUSをGX推進の柱とし、電力の炭素強度低減と産業脱炭素の両立が課題。本レビューは、再生可能エネルギーと回収プロセスの統合設計に関する実務的示唆を提供し、GXリーグやSSBJのScope1削減戦略に資する。
In the global GX context
Globally, CCUS is central to net-zero pathways under IEA and IPCC scenarios. This review maps how renewable and recovered energy can lower capture's lifecycle emissions, informing TCFD/ISSB transition plans and CSRD-aligned decarbonization disclosures for hard-to-abate sectors.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素回収と再生可能エネルギー統合の技術分類と研究ギャップを整理するのに有用。
🏢実務担当者:CCUS導入時のエネルギー調達・熱回収・電力炭素強度の設計判断に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:CCUSの実効性を左右する電力炭素強度やサイト固有条件を考慮した政策設計の参考になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Carbon capture could support deep decarbonisation only if the energy required for separation, regeneration, compression and refrigeration is supplied with low lifecycle emissions. This review approaches low-carbon and renewable energy integration into carbon-capture processes from the point of view of the technologies, integration problems and energy vectors encountered when entering the capture boundary: renewable heat (RH-CC), renewable electricity (RE-CC) and renewable or recovered cryogenic energy (CR-CC). For RH-CC, indirect solar heat (ISH) is the most retrofit-compatible route, whereas thermal or solvent storage improves flexibility, and direct solar solvent regeneration (DSSR) offers greater process intensification but remains largely model-based. For RE-CC, direct electric heating is the simplest option but retains the intrinsic regeneration duty. High-temperature heat pumps (HTHPs) and mechanical vapour recompression (MVR) show the strongest near-term potential through heat recovery and upgrading, whereas electrochemically and mechanically assisted pathways must be scaled up and require complete energy balances. CR-CC can combine renewable-powered refrigeration, recovered cold energy and liquid–air energy storage (LAES) in high-efficiency multi-purpose solutions, although multi-product boundaries complicate comparison. Across all pathways, promising solutions of low-carbon energy penetration and high separation performance have been identified and classified; although full development depends on resource quality, temporal matching, host–process integration and electricity carbon intensity in site-specific solutions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/en19194514first seen 2026-09-25 04:41:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。