← 論文一覧に戻る

経済的要素を考慮した産業部門におけるカーボンニュートラル

Carbon neutrality in industrial sectors taking the economic component into account (原題)

Михаил Михайлович Ищенко, Dmitrii S. MOCHALIN

Finance and Credit📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-28#エネルギー転換経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: chemical
DOI: 10.24891/ldcqsv
原典: https://doi.org/10.24891/ldcqsv

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

ガス・化学・原子力の3産業を対象に、原材料輸送から製品製造までの生産サイクル各段階での投資における経済的相互関係を分析する。各部門のカーボンニュートラル構造スキームを提案し、GHGコストが製品原価に与える影響を評価。GHG排出コストの上乗せとその回収期間に関する経済指標を示し、炭素中立を考慮した大規模産業プロジェクトのコスト算定には経済的手法の更なる研究が必要と結論づける。

English

Examines economic interrelations of carbon neutrality across the gas, chemical, and nuclear sectors, from raw-material transport to finished-product manufacturing. Proposes structural carbon-neutrality schemes per sector and assesses how GHG emission costs affect product cost, including markups and payback periods. Concludes that costing large industrial projects under carbon neutrality requires further methodological development to sustain global competitiveness.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

ロシアの研究機関による産業部門の炭素コスト分析であり、日本のSSBJ・有報開示やGX推進には直接接続しないが、製品原価への炭素コスト転嫁と回収期間の考え方は日本企業の内部炭素価格（ICP）設計の参考になりうる。

In the global GX context

Offers a sector-level view of how carbon costs propagate into product pricing and payback, relevant to internal carbon pricing and transition planning under ISSB/TCFD. Its Russian institutional origin limits direct comparability with CSRD/SEC-aligned disclosure regimes.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a sectoral framework linking carbon cost markups to product cost and payback across gas, chemical, and nuclear value chains.

🏢実務担当者:Useful reference for internal carbon pricing and assessing how GHG cost pass-through affects product margins and investment recovery.

🏛政策担当者:Illustrates how carbon cost markups and payback periods interact with industrial competitiveness, informing carbon pricing design.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Subject. Carbon neutrality. Objectives. To examine the economic interrelations in the context of carbon neutrality when investing at various stages of the production cycle – from raw material transportation to the direct manufacturing of finished products – using the example of three industrial sectors: gas, chemical, and nuclear. Methods. The study employs methods of logistics, statistical, and mathematical analysis, as well as comparison of the obtained data. Results. Structural schemes of carbon neutrality for the gas, chemical, and nuclear sectors have been proposed. An assessment is provided of the impact of greenhouse gas costs, taking into account their percentage share, on the product cost in the chemical sector. The main directions for achieving carbon neutrality with minimal economic impact on the sector within the life cycle have been developed. Economic indicators are presented regarding the markup on the cost of greenhouse gas emissions and the payback periods when this markup is included in the product cost. Conclusions. Determining the cost of large industrial projects with due regard to carbon neutrality requires further scientific research and development of the economic component of the methodology in industrial sectors to enhance competitiveness in global markets.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。