異常なサステナビリティ報告トーンと会計ファンダメンタルズの価値関連性
Abnormal Sustainability Reporting Tone and the Value Relevance of Accounting Fundamentals (原題)
Alessandra Allini, Alessandro Corrado, Luca Ferri, Annamaria Zampella
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ESG報告における異常なトーン(経済的ファンダメンタルズで説明できない裁量的なナラティブ)が企業価値と会計情報の価値関連性に与える影響を、欧州4カ国の上場企業2,002社(2017-2024年)のデータを用いて検証。テキスト分析で異常トーンを抽出し、Ohlson型評価モデルで分析した結果、異常トーンは企業価値と正の関連を持ち、利益と簿価の価値関連性を高めることが示された。
English
This study examines how abnormal tone in ESG reporting (discretionary narrative unexplained by fundamentals) affects firm value and the value relevance of accounting information, using a sample of 2,002 European listed firms (2017-2024). Using textual analysis to extract abnormal tone and Ohlson-type valuation models, the authors find that abnormal tone is positively associated with market value and enhances the value relevance of earnings and book value, suggesting that narrative framing conditions investor pricing of accounting fundamentals.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示が始まり、有報でのサステナビリティ情報の任意開示が進む中、ナラティブの質が投資家の評価に与える影響を示す本研究成果は、日本企業の開示戦略や投資家対応に示唆を与える。また、テキスト分析手法は日本語開示への応用可能性もあり、国内の開示インフラ整備に貢献し得る。
In the global GX context
In the global context of evolving sustainability disclosure standards (ISSB, CSRD, SEC), this study provides empirical evidence that discretionary narrative tone in ESG reports influences how investors price accounting fundamentals. This has implications for standard setters and regulators concerned about greenwashing and the decision-usefulness of sustainability disclosures, highlighting the need to monitor narrative quality alongside quantitative metrics.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides novel evidence on the moderating role of abnormal sustainability tone in value relevance, extending the literature on textual analysis and ESG disclosure.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights that narrative tone in sustainability reports can affect market valuation, suggesting careful crafting of disclosures to avoid unintended pricing effects.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that regulators should consider narrative quality in sustainability reporting standards to ensure transparency and prevent misleading impressions.
📄 Abstract(原文)
ABSTRACT This study investigates whether and how abnormal sustainability reporting tone is associated with the firm's market value and conditions the value relevance of accounting fundamentals. Building on impression‐management theory, the value relevance literature, and recent advances in textual analysis, we focus on the discretionary component of tone embedded in sustainability and integrated reports, namely narrative deviations unexplained by firms' economic fundamentals. Using a sample of 2002 European listed firms from France, Germany, Italy, and Spain over the period 2017–2024 (16,016 firm‐year observations), we extract abnormal tone from ESG‐related disclosures through a two‐step procedure. First, we compute a multidimensional tone index based on positive, negative, uncertainty, litigious, and modal linguistic categories derived from the Loughran and McDonald dictionary. Second, following prior textual‐analysis studies, abnormal tone is measured as the residual component from a tone‐prediction model estimated on firms' economic fundamentals and performance characteristics. We estimate Ohlson‐type valuation models in which the market value of equity is regressed on earnings per share (EPS), book value per share (BVPS), and abnormal tone, while also examining whether abnormal tone moderates the pricing of accounting fundamentals. The results show that abnormal sustainability reporting tone is positively associated with firm market value. More importantly, abnormal tone is associated with greater value relevance of both earnings and book value, indicating that discretionary narrative framing appears to condition how investors interpret and price accounting information. Economic magnitude analyses further reveal that the economic relevance of abnormal tone appears to arise through its moderating role, with the interaction effects exhibiting substantially larger magnitudes than the standalone valuation effect of tone itself. Additional analyses suggest that this conditioning role may have become more pronounced over time. Overall, the findings suggest that sustainability reporting tone matters not because it substitutes for financial information, but because it appears to condition the informational context in which accounting fundamentals are assessed. This study contributes to the value relevance and sustainability reporting literatures by providing novel evidence that abnormal narrative tone in ESG disclosures is associated with differences in the market pricing of earnings and book value, with important implications for regulators, standard setters, and market participants in the evolving European reporting landscape.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70907first seen 2026-08-19 04:50:13
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70907first seen 2026-08-20 05:08:47 · last seen 2026-09-21 05:02:16
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。