アジア太平洋地域における国際水素サプライチェーン形成に関する日本の政策
JAPAN’S POLICY ON FORMING INTERNATIONAL HYDROGEN SUPPLY CHAINS IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION (原題)
Konstantin A. Korneev
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
日本が国内資源制約と脱炭素目標を背景に、アジア太平洋地域で国際水素サプライチェーンを構築する政策を分析した論文。二国間・多国間協定、専用ターミナル整備、輸送・貯蔵技術の実証、国家標準・認証制度の導入を通じ、日本が地域水素市場のアーキテクチャ形成を主導していると論じる。官民連携や金融支援が日本企業の地域イニシアチブを支え、政策が純粋なエネルギー目標を超えた技術・経済協力モデルを形成していると示す。ロシア極東との協力可能性にも言及する。
English
This paper analyzes Japan's policy for building international hydrogen supply chains across the Asia-Pacific, driven by limited domestic resources, import dependence, and climate goals. It shows Japan leading regional hydrogen projects through bilateral and multilateral agreements, dedicated terminals, transport and storage technology trials, and national standards and certification systems. Public-private partnerships and financial support enable Japanese firms to coordinate regional initiatives, shaping the architecture of a future Asia-Pacific hydrogen trading market. It also notes potential Russia-Japan cooperation in the Russian Far East.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
水素の国際調達・認証制度は、日本のエネルギー転換政策と産業競争力に直結する論点。SSBJや有報での気候関連開示においても、水素調達戦略はScope3・移行計画の説明材料となる。日本主導の水素市場設計は、国内企業の調達リスクと技術輸出機会の両面で示唆を持つ。
In the global GX context
Hydrogen supply-chain and certification architecture is central to global transition finance and energy security debates, and Japan's standards-setting role offers a case study in how national policy shapes emerging international markets. It connects to ISSB/TCFD transition-plan disclosure, where hydrogen procurement and infrastructure commitments increasingly appear as transition levers.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:日本の水素外交・認証制度設計を、国際市場形成の観点から分析する枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:水素調達・国際サプライチェーン参画を検討する企業にとって、日本の政策支援と標準化動向の把握に有用。
🏛政策担当者:水素市場の国際ルール形成と認証制度における日本の主導的役割を検討する際の参考になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
In the context of the global transition to a low-carbon development trajectory, hydrogen is becoming a key element of energy security and decarbonization of the economy. The article is devoted to the analysis of Japan’s policy on the formation of international hydrogen supply chains in the Asia-Pacific region. Japan’s limited domestic energy resources, heavy dependence on imports, and ambitious climate goals make cross-border hydrogen infrastructure a strategic priority for Tokyo. Japan considers the import of low-carbon hydrogen as a tool to ensure sustainable energy supply, diversify energy sources and strengthen technological leadership in promising industries.The paper shows that Japan currently plays a leading role in developing and implementing international hydrogen projects. It is actively building bilateral and multilateral agreements with Asia-Pacific countries, establishing specialized terminals, testing transport and storage technologies, and introducing national standards and certification systems. Increased attention is being paid to institutional mechanisms, public-private partnerships, and financial support that allow Japanese corporations to initiate and coordinate regional initiatives. The study demonstrates that Japan’s policy goes beyond purely energy objectives, forming a sustainable model of technological and economic cooperation capable of shaping the architecture of the future hydrogen trading market in the Asia-Pacific region.The potential remains within the framework of Russian-Japanese cooperation. Russia has significant resources for the production of low-carbon hydrogen, which, combined with Japanese technological and investment opportunities, creates objective conditions for launching joint pilot projects in the Russian Far East. Despite the difficult foreign policy environment, geographical proximity is a factor determining the long-term prospects for cooperation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.48137/26870703_2026_35_3_6first seen 2026-10-31 04:45:13 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:35:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。