持続可能な生計適応に向けた自然基盤ソリューションの可能性：バングラデシュ沿岸部の事例
Understanding the Potential of Nature-based Solutions to Sustainable Livelihood Adaptation: Evidence from Coastal Bangladesh (原題)
Md Salman Hossain, Md Parvez, Jubair Howlader, S M Hemayet Jahan, Mohammad Atikur Rahman, Md Nurul Amin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
バングラデシュ沿岸部3地域の住民164名への調査から、自然基盤ソリューション（NbS）と持続的生計フレームワークを統合し、気候ショックへの適応効果を検証した初の試み。サイクロンと塩害が主要ショックで、NbSは農民・漁民の所得機会と生産損失削減、適応能力向上に寄与するが効果は生計タイプで異なる。途上国沿岸域の適応政策に示唆を与える。
English
First study integrating nature-based solutions (NbS) with the sustainable livelihood framework, surveying 164 residents in three coastal unions of Bangladesh. Cyclones and salinity were the main shocks; NbS boosted income opportunities (76% farmers, 97% fishers) and adaptive capacity, with effects varying by livelihood type. Offers evidence for climate adaptation in resource-dependent coastal systems.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では直接の接続は薄いが、気候適応策と地域生計の統合評価手法は、国内の流域治水・グリーンインフラ政策や適応計画の設計に参考となる視点を提供する。
In the global GX context
While focused on Bangladesh, this work contributes to the global adaptation literature by operationalizing NbS within a livelihood framework, relevant to climate-resilient development and adaptation finance discussions under the Paris Agreement and SDGs.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:NbSと生計フレームワークの統合評価手法に関心のある適応研究者に有用。
🏢実務担当者:途上国での適応プロジェクト設計や地域コミュニティ支援に関わる実務者に示唆。
🏛政策担当者:気候適応政策においてNbSを生計支援と結びつける根拠を提供。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Sustainable livelihood adaptation against climate change-induced shocks requires adequate understanding of integrated impacts on livelihood systems and potential adaptive techniques. This study is the first attempt to address the integration of nature-based solutions (NbS) with the sustainable livelihood framework (SLF) to examine their potential for strengthening coastal livelihood adaptation to diverse climatic shocks. We employed semi-structured face-to-face questionnaire surveys (n = 164) across three coastal unions of Kalapara sub-district, Bangladesh, considering NbS-dependent livelihoods and frequent coastal shocks. The responses were analyzed to assess perceived shocks exposure across different livelihood capitals and the associated outcomes of NbS adoptions. The findings indicate that cyclones were the most commonly reported shock, followed by salinity, with statistically significant differences in how drought, salinity, and tidal flooding affect farmers versus fishermen (p < 0.001). NbS was perceived to stimulate income opportunities for farmers (76%) and fishermen (97%), and reduce production loss (e.g., 84% for farmers). Reported increased income for NbS significantly influences additional livelihood opportunities (farmers: χ² = 13.680, p < 0.001; fishermen: χ² = 5.950, p = 0.015), and increased adaptive capacity (farmers: χ² = 84.664, p < 0.001; fishermen: χ² = 11.156, p = 0.001) to shocks. Our study results suggest that NbS has the potential to enhance multiple livelihood capitals and improve outcomes when facilitated by institutional and social learning mechanisms, although their effectiveness varies by livelihood types. The findings offer insights for natural resource-dependent coastal systems worldwide and provide an evidence-based SLF for integrating NbS into climate adaptation in developing countries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100383first seen 2026-10-16 05:00:06
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。