緩和戦略の受容性向上
Enhancing Acceptability of the Mitigation Strategy (原題)
Ian Parry, Simon Black, Nate Vernon-Lin, Karlygash Zhunussova
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は緩和戦略の受容性を高める上で重要な二つの課題、すなわち家計への負担と貿易財企業の競争力・炭素漏洩を検討する。炭素価格の家計負担を所得層・地域別に推計する手法と補償策を整理し、主要国・G20諸国の産業別に競争力・漏洩効果の定量手法と対策（歳入リサイクル、国境炭素調整等）を論じる。
English
This chapter addresses two central challenges to the acceptability of mitigation strategy: household burdens and the competitiveness/emissions leakage effects on trade-exposed firms. It reviews methodologies for estimating household burdens by income group and region, and for quantifying competitiveness and leakage effects across selected G20 countries and industries, analyzing remedies such as revenue recycling, alternative instruments, and border carbon adjustments.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
炭素価格の受容性と国境調整は、日本がGX推進と炭素賦課金導入を検討する上で直接的な示唆を持つ。家計負担の補償設計や産業競争力への配慮は、国内政策の合意形成に重要。
In the global GX context
As carbon pricing and CBAM-like mechanisms advance under EU/global frameworks, this chapter provides conceptual and methodological grounding for balancing household compensation and competitiveness/leakage concerns—key for ISSB-era transition policy design.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素価格の家計負担・競争力・漏洩の定量手法と政策オプションを整理した枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:炭素価格導入時のコスト影響と補償・国境調整の論点を把握し、リスク管理に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:炭素価格の受容性を高めるための家計補償や国境調整の設計オプションを検討する際の参考になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Enhancing the acceptability of the mitigation strategy is important for increasing the likelihood it is successfully implemented and sustained over time. This chapter focuses on two especially challenging issues that are central to acceptability, namely burdens on households and the competitiveness and emissions leakage implications of burdens for trade-exposed firms. The first half of this chapter discusses conceptually the burden of carbon pricing on households, measures to compensate households, and compares burdens from carbon pricing and other mitigation instruments. Methodologies for estimating household burdens by income group and region are then discussed, along with illustrative quantitative results for selected countries. The second half of this chapter provides a conceptual discussion of competitiveness and emissions leakage effects. Methodologies for quantifying these effects are discussed, along with results for selected G20 countries and industries. And options for addressing these effects are analyzed, including within-sector recycling of carbon pricing revenues, using other mitigation instruments, and border carbon adjustments (international policy coordination approaches are discussed in Chapter 9 ). To keep discussion manageable, the discussion is mostly limited to policies affecting the energy sector.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003755012-6first seen 2026-10-11 04:38:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。