Subjective energy poverty and attitudes on climate change mitigation measures: Empirical and ethical considerations
主観的エネルギー貧困と気候変動緩和策への態度：実証的・倫理的考察 (AI 翻訳)
Jukka Sivonen, Helena Siipi, Vuokko Härmä, Sakari Karvonen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、フィンランドの全国調査データ（n=5,909）を用いて、主観的エネルギー貧困が気候変動緩和策（化石燃料課税やナッジ）への支持に与える影響を分析。結果、主観的エネルギー貧困が高いほど対策への支持が低いことが示された。これは、気候政策の設計・コミュニケーションにおいてエネルギー貧困への配慮の重要性を強調する。
English
Using Finnish national survey data (n=5,909), this study examines how subjective energy poverty affects support for climate mitigation measures such as fossil fuel taxation and nudges. Results indicate that higher subjective energy poverty is associated with lower support for these measures, highlighting the need to address energy poverty in climate policy design and communication.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもエネルギー価格高騰とカーボンプライシング導入が進む中、主観的エネルギー貧困が政策受容性に与える影響を考慮することは重要。本知見は、日本のGX政策における公平性と社会的受容性の確保に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This study adds to global discourse on just transition by demonstrating that subjective energy poverty—independent of objective conditions—reduces support for climate mitigation measures. It underscores the importance of integrating energy poverty alleviation into climate policy frameworks such as the EU's Just Transition Mechanism.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for scholars studying energy justice, policy acceptance, and the social dimensions of climate transitions.
🏢実務担当者:Policymakers and communicators can leverage these findings to design more inclusive climate policies that address energy poverty.
🏛政策担当者:Relevant for designing carbon pricing and other mitigation policies with equity considerations to avoid backlash from vulnerable groups.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Objective energy poverty-commonly defined using indicators such as the relationship between energy costs, income, and energy required for adequate living-has been widely studied, yet less is known about how subjective energy poverty shapes attitudes toward climate change mitigation measures. This study examines theoretical and empirical links between subjective energy poverty and support for climate measures, including fossil fuel taxation and two climate nudges. We argue that "leaving behind" harm arises from subjective energy poverty independently of objective conditions, whereas economic harms from climate nudges are more likely among individuals experiencing only objective energy poverty. Empirically, we analyze nationally representative Finnish survey data from 2023 (n = 5909) using ordered probit regression. Results show that higher subjective energy poverty is associated with lower support for climate measures. The findings highlight the importance of addressing energy poverty in designing and communicating climate policy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02434-7first seen 2026-07-19 04:45:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。