gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Analysis of Compliance Levels and Comparison of Disclosure of GRI 2021 Sustainability Report on New and Renewable Energy Companies

新・再生可能エネルギー企業におけるGRI 2021サステナビリティ報告書の開示遵守レベルの分析と比較 (AI 翻訳)

Radhiyyah Nadhira Harviaputri, Shiddiq Nur Rahardjo

Journal of Business and Management Review📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-02-28#開示インフラ
DOI: 10.47153/jbmr.v7i2.2107
原典: https://doi.org/10.47153/jbmr.v7i2.2107

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、インドネシアの再生可能エネルギー企業5社(PGEO、BREN、PTBA、DSSA、MEDC)の2024年サステナビリティ報告書におけるGRI 2021準拠度を分析。内容分析の結果、PTBA(97%)、PGEO(86%)、MEDC(86%)は「Well Applied」、DSSA(64%)、BREN(53%)は「Partially Applied」と分類され、国有企業は規制圧力と高い公共期待により包括的な開示を行う傾向が示された。正当性理論の関連性を強化し、報告の透明性向上の必要性を指摘。

English

This study analyzes GRI 2021 compliance in sustainability reports of five Indonesian renewable energy companies for 2024. Using content analysis, it finds PTBA (97%), PGEO (86%), and MEDC (86%) as 'Well Applied', while DSSA (64%) and BREN (53%) as 'Partially Applied'. State-owned firms show higher disclosure due to regulatory pressure. The findings support legitimacy theory and highlight the need for improved economic, environmental, and social disclosures.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文はインドネシアの再生可能エネルギー企業におけるGRI準拠度を分析しており、日本企業が海外展開やサステナビリティ報告のベンチマークとして参考になる。また、日本でもGRIとSSBJの関係が議論される中、開示の実態把握に寄与する。

In the global GX context

This study adds to the literature on sustainability disclosure compliance in emerging markets, particularly for the renewable energy sector. It demonstrates variation in compliance and the role of state ownership, which is relevant for global investors and regulators assessing the quality of non-financial reporting in developing economies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Useful for scholars studying sustainability disclosure compliance in emerging markets and the application of legitimacy theory.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can benchmark their GRI compliance against Indonesian renewable energy firms.

🏛政策担当者:Regulators in developing countries can learn from the variation in compliance to design better enforcement mechanisms.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Research Aims: This study aims to analyze the level of compliance with sustainability report disclosure based on GRI 2021 on companies in the new and renewable energy sector in Indonesia. This research is motivated by the urgency of supporting the national net zero emission target and the increasing demands for transparency and accountability from stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a descriptive-comparative approach with a content analysis method for the 2024 sustainability report on five companies (PGEO, BREN, PTBA, DSSA, and MEDC). The compliance assessment was carried out based on the indicators GRI 2, GRI 3, GRI 200, GRI 300, and GRI 400. Each indicator is assessed using a binary scale, then the percentage is calculated and classified according to the GRI 2021 compliance criteria. Research Findings: The results showed significant variation in compliance levels. PTBA (97%), PGEO (86%), and MEDC (86%) are classified as Well Applied, while DSSA (64%) and BREN (53%) are classified as Partially Applied. State-owned companies tend to have more comprehensive disclosures due to regulatory pressures and higher public expectations. Companies with low scores need to improve disclosure on economic, environmental, and social aspects to align with international reporting standards. Theoretical Contribution/Originality: This research strengthens the relevance of legitimacy theory in explaining the disclosure behavior of companies in the new and renewable energy sector. Comprehensive sustainability reports are used as a means of gaining and retaining stakeholder support. The research findings make an empirical contribution to the sustainability reporting literature in Indonesia as well as practical implications for regulators, investors, and companies to improve transparency, accountability, and alignment with renewable energy targets and national sustainable development. Keywords: Global Reporting Initiative, New Renewable Energy, Compliance Levels, Legitimacy Theory, Sustainability Reporting

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。