Does Climate Finance Influence Environmental Sustainability?
気候変動資金は環境持続可能性に影響を与えるか？ (AI 翻訳)
Monica Singhania, Renuka Prasad
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はアジア33カ国を対象に、緩和・適応に分類した気候変動資金がCO2、メタン、N2O排出、エコロジカルフットプリント、負荷容量因子に与える影響を分析。動的パネルGMM推定の結果、適応資金は持続可能性を向上させるが、緩和資金の効果は限定的。経済成長や貿易開放が環境圧力を高めるため、ガバナンス強化が必要。
English
This study examines the impact of mitigation and adaptation climate finance on multiple environmental indicators across 33 Asian economies (2000-2021). Using dynamic panel GMM, it finds adaptation finance significantly reduces methane and nitrous oxide emissions and improves load capacity, while mitigation finance shows limited effect on CO2 or ecological footprint. Results emphasize balancing finance flows and strengthening governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本を含むアジア33カ国を対象としており、日本の気候変動資金配分（特に適応分野）の有効性評価に示唆を与える。SSBJやTCFDとは直接関係しないが、資金の環境効果を多面的に検証した点で政策立案に有用。
In the global GX context
While not directly addressing disclosure frameworks, this paper provides empirical evidence on the differential effectiveness of mitigation vs. adaptation finance, informing global climate finance debates. Its multi-indicator approach (beyond CO2) aligns with evolving sustainability metrics in TCFD/ISSB contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides novel evidence on adaptation finance effectiveness using multi-dimensional environmental indicators across Asia.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for balanced climate finance portfolios, particularly allocating more to adaptation for broader sustainability gains.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests aligning climate finance allocation with Paris Agreement and SDGs, strengthening governance to maximize environmental outcomes.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate Finance has gained prominence as a vital instrument to support the global transition towards environmental sustainability. While existing studies primarily emphasise carbon dioxide reduction, relatively little is known about how climate finance affects broader ecological outcomes and the role of adaptation finance. This study examines the influence of climate finance—disaggregated into mitigation and adaptation flows—on multiple sustainability indicators across 33 Asian economies from 2000 to 2021. Environmental outcomes are measured through carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions, as well as the ecological footprints and the load capacity factor, thereby providing a multidimensional view of sustainability. To address endogeneity and dynamic effects, the analysis employs a dynamic panel approach using the two‐step system generalised method of moments. The results indicate that climate finance significantly reduces methane and nitrous oxide emissions, while enhancing the load capacity factor; its effects on carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprint remain limited. Adaptation finance has a stronger positive impact on ecological sustainability than mitigation finance, underscoring the importance of a balanced allocation between the two components. Economic growth, trade openness and industrial activity continue to increase environmental pressures, which calls for stronger governance frameworks and improved institutional mechanisms to ensure effective use of climate finance. By extending the scope beyond CO 2 ‐centric analyses and distinguishing between mitigation and adaptation flows, this study contributes fresh evidence to the climate finance literature. The findings carry important implications for policymakers, emphasising the need to align financial allocations with the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals to achieve lasting sustainability outcomes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70181first seen 2026-05-15 21:20:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。