← 論文一覧に戻る

Greening unequal? Conceptualising the impacts of the green transition from a global gendered lens (GPERC#105)

不平等なグリーン化?グローバルなジェンダー視点から見たグリーン転換の影響の概念化(GPERC#105) (AI 翻訳)

Jasmin Lukasz, Maria Nikolaidi, Özlem Onaran

Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)ジャーナル2026-06-30#just_transition対象セクター: cross_sector
原典: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-5482

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、グリーン転換のマクロ経済的・社会的影響をグローバル・セクター・ジェンダーの統合的視点から分析する枠組みを提示する。南北間の不均等な影響、グリーン資源採取主義、ジェンダー不平等に焦点を当て、ポストケインズ派・エコロジー経済学・フェミニスト経済学を統合。グリーン政策とパープル政策(ケア経済支援)の組み合わせが不平等を軽減できると論じる。

English

This paper presents a conceptual framework integrating global, sectoral, and gendered analysis of the green transition's macroeconomic and social impacts. It highlights uneven effects between Global North and South, green extractivism, and gendered consequences through paid/unpaid work. Drawing on post-Keynesian, ecological, and feminist economics, it argues that combining green and 'purple' (care-oriented) policies can reduce inequalities.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では再生可能エネルギー拡大やEV普及が進むが、海外の資源採掘やサプライチェーンへの依存により、グリーン移行が国内の雇用やジェンダー平等に与える影響も考慮する必要がある。本枠組みは日本の政策立案にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, the just transition discourse increasingly recognizes the need to address intersectional inequalities. This framework adds a macrofinancial and gendered perspective to the existing literature, relevant for international climate policy and financing mechanisms.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides an integrated framework for analyzing the green transition's distributional effects across global, sectoral, and gender dimensions.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of combining green policies with social policies (purple policies) to avoid exacerbating inequalities, relevant for just transition planning.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This paper presents a conceptual framework for an integrated global, sectoral and gendered analysis of the macroeconomic and social dimensions of the green transition with a focus on three critical aspects. The first concerns the uneven global effects of the green transition. Due to differentiated sectoral structures and positions in the global financial architecture, the transition has highly uneven effects across countries: interconnected global production and financial networks can result in the green transition in the Global North having important adverse macrofinancial effects on Global South countries, particularly those reliant on fossil fuel exports, raising climate justice concerns. The second refers to the environmental footprint of green structural change that extends well beyond direct emissions: resource-intensive green activities, such as electric vehicle production, drive ecological degradation through supply chains in Global South producer countries and reinforce green extractivism, making adaptation and the protection of water, land, and biodiversity central for a just green transition. The third is related to the gendered effects of the transition, which can either intensify or reduce existing inequalities through the impact of the green transition on women’s paid and unpaid work. These effects diverge between North and South due to differences in labour informality, exposure to environmental degradation, and the gender composition of ‘green’, ‘fossil’, and ‘purple’ sectors. Drawing on post-Keynesian, ecological, and feminist macroeconomics, as well as the physical and monetary input-output approaches, the paper develops a framework that emphasises international and sectoral spillover effects, macrofinancial channels and the local-specific gendered effects of green policies through paid and unpaid work. Based on this framework, the paper outlines how the combined use of green and purple policies can reduce global, sectoral and gender inequalities.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。