← 論文一覧に戻る

大規模モデル計算のための持続可能で相乗的なエネルギー管理

Sustainable and Synergistic Energy Management for Large Model Computing (原題)

Jing-Bo Hao, Tao Yang

AI Engineering📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-10#エネルギー転換経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.53941/aieng.2026.100016
原典: https://doi.org/10.53941/aieng.2026.100016
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

大規模言語モデル等の計算インフラ電力消費を、電力系統の制約下で両立させる方策をレビューした論文。グリーンエネルギー供給、グリーンコンピューティング、計算・エネルギー連携(CES)の3つのレバーを整理し、PUE・CUE・WUE・トークン当たりエネルギー等の指標を比較の基盤として提示する。CESについては集中・分散・ハイブリッドのアルゴリズムを比較し、再エネ不確実性や系統混雑、炭素価格変動下での実現可能性を分析。24/7カーボンフリー調達と柔軟なワークロード scheduling の統合など3つの研究ギャップを特定する。

English

This review synthesizes literature on reconciling large-model computing with power-system limits via three levers: green energy supply, green computing, and computing-energy synergy (CES). It consolidates energy-efficiency techniques and sustainability metrics (PUE, CUE, WUE, energy per token, carbon per workload) into comparative tables, deepens CES treatment across centralized/distributed/hybrid paradigms, and formulates a joint scheduling problem under renewable uncertainty, storage limits, grid congestion, and price volatility. Three research gaps are identified, including integrating 24/7 carbon-free procurement with flexible workload scheduling.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

AIデータセンターの電力消費と脱炭素は、日本のGX政策・企業の再エネ調達・Scope2管理に直結する。SSBJ開示や投資家対応において、計算需要の増大を踏まえたエネルギー管理と炭素指標の整備は重要な論点となる。

In the global GX context

As AI compute demand surges, this review connects data-center energy management to global disclosure frameworks (TCFD/ISSB) and 24/7 carbon-free electricity procurement. It offers a metrics backbone (PUE, CUE, WUE, carbon per workload) that can inform corporate climate targets and transition planning for the tech sector.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:AI計算と電力系統の連携アルゴリズムおよび未解決の研究課題を整理する際の参照枠組みを提供する。

🏢実務担当者:データセンターのエネルギー効率指標と再エネ調達・ワークロード柔軟性を組み合わせた脱炭素戦略の検討に役立つ。

🏛政策担当者:AI計算需要の増大を電力系統計画や炭素価格設計にどう織り込むかの政策的示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract(原文)

The rapid growth of foundation models, most prominently large language models (LLMs), is turning the electricity consumption of computing infrastructure into a first-order constraint on the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. This review synthesizes recent literature on three levers for reconciling large-model computing with power-system limits: green energy supply, green computing, and computing-energy synergy (CES), i.e., the coordinated operation of computing infrastructure and power systems. Beyond earlier descriptive accounts, the review makes four contributions: (1) comparative assessments that condense the energy-supply options for AI data centers and the principal energy-efficiency techniques, including quantization, pruning, knowledge distillation, batching, dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS), and scheduling, into single-view tables with their performance, latency, cost, energy, and carbon trade-offs; (2) an explicit introduction of standard sustainability metrics (PUE, CUE, WUE, energy per token, and carbon emissions per workload) as the quantitative backbone for comparing the surveyed approaches; and (3) a substantially deepened treatment of CES, comparing centralized, distributed, and hybrid algorithmic paradigms, formulating a representative joint scheduling problem, and analyzing feasibility under engineering constraints such as renewable-supply uncertainty, storage limits, grid congestion, workload deadlines, latency requirements, and electricity and carbon price volatility; and (4) a conceptual framework, that links supply-side options, the sustainability-metrics backbone, demand-side workload flexibility, and power-system engineering constraints into a single coordination view. Three research gaps are identified: integrating 24/7 carbon-free electricity procurement with flexible workload scheduling; co-scheduling delay-tolerant training with latency-sensitive inference; and embedding power-system constraints and market signals into CES algorithms. The evidence reviewed indicates that green energy lowers the operational emissions of large-model computing but does not by itself deliver continuous carbon-free operation; green computing techniques can substantially reduce energy per unit of computation at accuracy or latency costs; and CES is a promising coordination paradigm whose large-scale feasibility still needs to be demonstrated under realistic engineering constraints.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。