公正なエネルギー移行のための市民金融？英国の経験分析とスマート地域エネルギーシステムの可能性の探求
Citizen finance for a just energy transition? Analysing UK experience, and exploring potential for smart local energy systems (原題)
Tim Braunholtz‐Speight, Maria; id_orcid 0000-0002-5521-700X Sharmina, Dimitrios Pappas, Jeff Hardy
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
英国のエネルギー移行には巨額の投資が必要であり、市民金融とスマート地域エネルギーシステム（SLES）が公正性向上の代替案として注目される。混合手法のケーススタディにより、市民金融は投資参加を広げ透明性を高めるが、利益再分配の効果は限定的で、高所得者層に偏ることを示した。政策措置によりリスクを低減すれば、SLES資金調達に貢献できる可能性がある。
English
The UK energy transition requires billions in investment; citizen finance and smart local energy systems (SLES) are proposed as alternatives to enhance energy justice. A mixed-methods case study finds citizen finance widens participation and transparency but limited redistribution, skewed to wealthier investors. With policy measures, it could fund low-risk SLES elements.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の地域分散型エネルギーや市民出資型プロジェクト（例：市民風車）の文脈で示唆に富む。SSBJ開示や地域脱炭素政策と関連し、市民参加型資金調達の公正性評価に参考となる。
In the global GX context
Contributes to global discourse on just transition and climate finance, offering empirical evidence on citizen finance's role in funding local energy systems. Relevant for ISSB-aligned disclosure on social aspects and transition finance frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on citizen finance's impact on energy justice and its potential for SLES funding.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for community energy groups and local authorities on financing models for smart local energy systems.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policy design to lower participation barriers and enhance equity in citizen finance for energy transition.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The UK energy transition is projected to require billions of pounds of investment, not only in renewable supply, but also in demand-side technologies and system management. While this investment is expected to come from large scale commercial finance, both citizen finance and smart local energy systems (SLES) are suggested as alternatives with potential to enhance energy justice. We conducted a mixed-methods UK case study to examine whether citizen finance can support a more just energy transition, and whether it can contribute to financing future SLES. Comparing data from a unique Cooperatives UK survey of citizen investors with London Stock Exchange data on commercial energy investors, we find that citizen finance widens participation in energy investment to some extent, and involves fewer intermediaries and greater transparency than commercial finance. However, citizen finance has limited potential to directly redistribute the financial benefits of energy projects: returns remain proportional to the amount invested, and citizen investment is still skewed toward older and higher-income people with the capacity to make long-term financial commitments. Drawing on interviews with professionals in citizen finance and low carbon energy development, we further find that citizen finance could facilitate funding relatively low-risk, low-return elements of SLES, and might also support more complex place-based SLES that commercial investors find challenging. With policy and practice measures to lower the risks of participation for the less wealthy, citizen finance could play a role in funding future SLES.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104880first seen 2026-08-22 04:49:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。