メディアにおける食料と気候変動：2023年ドバイCOP国際報道のケーススタディ
Food and climate change in the media: a case study of the international coverage of the Dubai COP in 2023 (原題)
James Painter, Silje Kristiansen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
COP28ドバイ会合における食料・食生活・気候変動の関連について、農業輸出・食料部門が重要な5カ国（アルゼンチン、豪、伯、英、米）の約50媒体の報道を手動内容分析で評価。COP28報道のうち食料を深く扱ったのはわずか6%で、食料システム改革派と肉・畜産擁護派が同程度に登場。食産業ロビイストの存在への言及は乏しかった。
English
Manual content analysis of ~50 outlets in five food-important countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, UK, USA) on COP28 coverage of the food-climate nexus. Only 6% of COP28 coverage discussed food in depth; meat/livestock defenders (trade groups, politicians) were as prominent as reform advocates (NGOs, agencies). Few articles noted food-industry lobbyists' presence.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
食料システムはScope 3排出の主要源であり、日本企業のフード・小売・外食セクターのGHG開示やSSBJ対応を考える上で、報道が政策議論をどう形成するかを示す示唆がある。ただし日本固有の分析ではない。
In the global GX context
Food systems account for 21-37% of global GHG emissions yet remain marginal in climate discourse; this study quantifies media neglect and the balance of pro-reform vs. incumbent voices, relevant to how disclosure debates (Scope 3, FLAG) gain or lose public salience around COP/ISSB processes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides an empirical baseline on media framing of the food-climate nexus and a replicable manual content-analysis design for COP coverage studies.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights reputational and narrative risk for food/agri companies whose climate positions are scrutinized in COP coverage.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests media under-reporting of food systems and lobbyist influence, an argument for stronger communication and transparency around food-climate policy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract The UN’s annual climate change negotiations, known as the Conference of Parties (COPs), are crucial venues for raising awareness and advancing international dialogue on climate challenges. Mainstream media play a key role in shaping how the public and policymakers understand them. At COP28 in Dubai (2023), food systems - responsible for 21%-37% of total global greenhouse gas emissions – received unprecedented attention, despite their traditional neglect in the climate discourse. This study used manual content analysis to assess how around 50 news outlets across five countries where the agricultural export or food sector are particularly important to their economies (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, the UK, and the USA) covered the link between food, diet, and climate change during COP28. We find that media coverage of the food-climate nexus remained limited, as only 6% of all COP28 coverage discussed food in depth. Actors defending the meat and livestock sector – mainly trade groups and politicians – were as prominent as those calling for food system reform, such as NGOs and international agencies. The most common pro-reform argument emphasized the climate impact of food systems, while defenders of meat production highlighted environmental benefits, food security, and nutrition. Few articles mentioned the prominent presence of food industry lobbyists at the conference. Our findings suggest the need for further research into the obstacles to more frequent, thorough and critical reporting of the links between food systems and climate impacts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-026-04308-zfirst seen 2026-10-25 04:39:36 · last seen 2026-10-31 04:40:45
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。