規制仲介と台湾・基隆港におけるエネルギー転換準備

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:規制の域外波及と港の移行準備を測る診断指標の設計例として参照できる。

🏢実務担当者:港湾・海運の開示担当は、計画偏重から検証済み実績データへの移行の必要性を学べる。

🏛政策担当者:規制不確実性を協調投資と検証可能な環境性能に転換するガバナンス設計の参考になる。

International maritime environmental regulation is changing port sustainability from a predominantly local environmental-management task into a cross-organisational challenge involving vessels, energy systems, terminal operations, logistics customers, public authorities, and port-city communities. This article examines how the International Maritime Organization’s greenhouse-gas framework and the European Union’s FuelEU Maritime regime transmit strategic pressure to the non-EU Port of Keelung in Taiwan. The study develops a qualitative, embedded single-port research design that combines regulatory mapping, documentary analysis, official performance evidence, and a transparent Keelung Port Regulatory–Energy Transition Readiness Index (K-RTRI). The index is a diagnostic instrument rather than an emissions inventory. It assesses five dimensions on a 0–4 ordinal scale: regulatory exposure, infrastructure preparedness, governance and disclosure, operational incentives, and just-transition capacity. Evidence indicates that Keelung has moved beyond general aspiration. Its ESG roadmap, EcoPort engagement, smart-port initiatives, carbon-reduction programme, port-city cooperation, and planned high-voltage shore-power system at East Wharf No. 4 show meaningful institutional mobilisation. At the same time, publicly available evidence remains stronger for plans and implementation outputs than for recurring measurements of electricity delivered, actual shore-power connections, fuel displaced, or verified emissions avoided. The conservative overall K-RTRI score is 2.0 out of 4.0, signalling emerging readiness with a significant implementation and verification gap. The article proposes a management framework based on regulatory anticipation, contracted utilisation of clean-energy infrastructure, tiered green-port services, modular investment, verified data architecture, and a just port-city transition. The central argument is that Keelung’s competitive advantage will depend less on selecting a single future fuel than on building a governance architecture capable of converting regulatory uncertainty into coordinated investment, measurable environmental performance, and socially legitimate port services.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2026.13.5.1first seen 2026-10-26 04:37:50 · last seen 2026-10-31 04:40:54