Research on the Risk Contagion and Governance Mechanism of Capital Chain Rupture in China's Construction Industry
中国建設業における資本連鎖断裂のリスク伝染とガバナンスメカニズムに関する研究 (AI 翻訳)
Yuxuan Guo, Linxin Yin, Ruihan Xiong, KA I UN, Chengyi Pu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国建設業の売掛金が26兆元を超え、資金連鎖断裂リスクが深刻化する中、弱い立場の下請け企業に焦点を当て、AIと保険商品の革新を組み合わせたリスク管理体制を提案。グラジエントブースティングやTransformerを用いたモデルでリスクを予測し、カスタム履行保証保険やエスクロー口座などの対策を提示。
English
This study addresses the severe risk of capital chain rupture in China's construction industry, focusing on vulnerable subcontractors. It proposes an AI-assisted risk control platform and innovative insurance products, using gradient boosting and Transformer models to predict default risks and design preventive mechanisms.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国建設業の資金連鎖リスクは、日本の建設業界における下請け保護やファイナンスの課題と類似点があり、AIを活用したリスク管理の事例として参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper offers insights into supply chain finance and risk mitigation in construction, relevant to global discussions on financial stability and AI applications in risk management.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:AIと保険を組み合わせたリスク管理モデルの実践例として、建設業のサプライチェーン研究に示唆を与える。
🏢実務担当者:下請け企業の資金リスク管理や保険商品設計に応用可能な知見を提供。
🏛政策担当者:建設業の資金連鎖リスクに対する政策立案に、AIと保険の活用を検討する材料を提供。
📄 Abstract(原文)
(1) Currently, accounts receivable in China's construction industry have exceeded 26 trillion yuan. Influenced by the industry's unspoken rule of 'advancing funds and extended payment terms,' the problem of broken capital chains shows a trend of cash flow pressure being transmitted step by step along the industrial chain, with increasing delays in project payments. It is characterized by a concentration of fund-advancing by vulnerable intermediaries, the difficulty of recovering funds even after winning legal disputes, and the absence of industry capital protection mechanisms. This seriously undermines the wage rights of construction workers, hinders the development of the industry supply chain, and reduces the effectiveness of government regulatory policies. (2)There is a substantial amount of research literature on this issue. Qualitative studies focus on the challenges of industry pre-financing, the empowerment provided by supply chain finance, and international risk mitigation systems, while quantitative studies concentrate on the quantification and assessment of risk factors. However, existing viewpoints fail to reflect the dynamic trend of multi-faceted and complex industry financial risks, resulting in conclusions with low applicability and a lack of consideration for full-process control enabled by technology. (3)This article focuses on the governance of funding chain fracture risks caused by the advance payment of capital by disadvantaged intermediaries in the construction industry. The research targets intermediaries in weak positions, covering the identification, measurement, and prevention of financial risks in the domestic industry, as well as the design of preventive solutions and the construction of an intelligent risk control platform. From the perspective of supply chain finance, it integrates the innovation of engineering insurance products with intelligent risk management technology to build an AI-assisted risk analysis model, conducting research along the dual dimensions of 'product protection and technological empowerment.' (4)Research has found that disadvantaged intermediaries face the risk of differentiated underfunding, with the risk transmitted along the hierarchy of "owner-general contractor-intermediate contractor-construction workers." The existing financial protection mechanisms in the industry have shortcomings: credit insurance coverage is low and mismatched with demand, while traditional legal and financial instruments have high thresholds and long cycles. Artificial intelligence technology can accurately identify and dynamically warn of financial risks, and innovations in construction insurance can effectively transfer and disperse risks across the industry chain. (5)Recommendations: Develop innovative engineering insurance products, namely customized performance bonds insurance; leverage an online intelligent platform to build a full-process risk control system covering 'before, during, and after' project stages; establish escrow accounts to achieve closed-loop fund management, and utilize artificial intelligence models for precise risk prevention and control; construct a multi-party participation mechanism with clear responsibilities and obligations for macro and micro risk sharing, promoting deep integration of insurance technology with the construction industry; draw on international risk mitigation practices to optimize the domestic engineering fund risk control framework, and enhance the effectiveness of policy implementation. (6)This study draws on the following: Methodologically, it refers to literature analysis, expert evaluation, and game theory analysis; conceptually, it draws on the core logic of the international engineering finance three-tier risk mitigation system, as well as the idea of integrating supply chain finance with financial technology and blockchain to optimize capital allocation; data is sourced from industry statistics, engineering cases, etc.; in terms of modeling, it incorporates artificial intelligence algorithm models such as gradient boosting decision trees and Transformers. By combining domestic practical optimization results, a dual protection mechanism and an online intelligent risk control platform were implemented. Through quantitative measurement of risk factors, simulation of game behaviors, and computational operations of AI algorithms, mathematical logic inference is accomplished, enabling precise assessment of intermediaries' default risk, validation of optimal insurance solutions, and scientific prediction of funding chain rupture risks.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.70114/aimedr.2026.1.1.p32first seen 2026-05-17 07:39:27 · last seen 2026-08-02 06:11:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。