Mapping current and potential criminal and security issues associated with climate change mitigation technologies
気候変動緩和技術に関連する現状および潜在的な犯罪・安全保障問題のマッピング (AI 翻訳)
Sarah Ying Zheng, Shane D. Johnson, Paul Ekblom, Mark A. Maslin, Hervé Borrion, Lauren Young, Manja Nikolovska, Matthew P J Ashby, Lorenzo Pasculli
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
このスコーピングレビューは、再生可能エネルギー、CCUS、電気自動車などの気候変動緩和技術（CCMT）に伴う犯罪・安全保障リスクを体系的に調査した。97件の関連文献から、財産犯罪、サイバー攻撃、汚職、環境被害、人権侵害、国家安全保障上の脅威の6種類20の犯罪脅威を特定。グリーンウォッシュやCCUS関連の環境被害などが具体例として挙げられ、法的・政策的対策の必要性を強調している。
English
This scoping review systematically maps criminal and security risks associated with climate change mitigation technologies (CCMTs) such as renewables, CCUS, and electric vehicles. From 97 relevant articles, it identifies 20 distinct crime threats across six categories, including property crimes, cyber-attacks, financial crimes, environmental threats, human rights abuses, and national security threats. Notable examples include CCUS-related environmental damage, greenwashing, and territorial conflicts over green projects. The review also presents 22 potential countermeasures, mostly legal or policy-oriented, highlighting this under-researched aspect of sustainable development.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、GX実現に向けCCUSや水素などの新技術導入が進む中、本論文はそれらの技術に伴う犯罪・セキュリティリスクの体系的把握を提供。グリーンウォッシュ対策やサプライチェーンセキュリティの観点から、SSBJや統合報告書でのリスク開示にも示唆を与える。日本の政策立案者や企業は、技術導入と同時に犯罪予防策を検討する必要がある。
In the global GX context
As global climate mitigation technologies scale up, this paper provides a crucial overview of potential crime and security risks often overlooked in climate discourse. It informs policymakers and practitioners on emerging threats like greenwashing and cyber-attacks on renewable infrastructure, relevant for jurisdictions implementing ISSB/CSRD standards that require risk disclosure. The study underscores the need to integrate security considerations into climate mitigation supply chains.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Highlights a neglected intersection of climate and criminology, offering a taxonomy of risks for further empirical study.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use the risk categories in due diligence for green projects and supply chain security.
🏛政策担当者:Provides evidence for developing crime prevention regulations in climate technology deployment.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Our transition to a low-carbon future critically depends on technologies to mitigate climate change (CCMTs). These include renewable energies, carbon capture, utilisation and sequestration (CCUS), and electric vehicles. As many of them are still evolving technologies, they will likely present novel crime and security risks. Unfortunately, knowledge about such risks is still limited and fragmentary. This scoping review aims to bridge this gap and inform policymakers to prevent such emerging risks. We found 97 relevant articles from a total of 1139 papers we screened from academic and non-academic sources across disciplines. They revealed 20 distinct crime threats of six different natures: property offences, cyber-attacks, financial crime and corruption, environmental threats, human rights abuse, and national security threats. Notable examples of criminogenic situations are CCUS-related environmental threats, greenwashing, and territorial conflicts over “green projects” that require adequate future crime prevention strategies. To that end, we also found 22 (potential) countermeasures, mostly of a legal or policy nature. This comprehensive overview highlights what appears to be an under-researched aspect of sustainable development, which we believe should include ensuring safety and security throughout climate mitigation supply chains.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102036first seen 2026-07-30 05:43:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。