gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Crowding out or complementing? Renewable portfolio standards and carbon price-signal dilution in China's ETS pilots

クラウディングアウトか補完か?中国排出権取引パイロットにおける再生可能エネルギー義務化と炭素価格シグナルの希薄化 (AI 翻訳)

Song Chai, Jin Yang, Lin Tang, Xintian Bi, Maiyue Zhang, Zihao Wang

Energy Strategy Reviews📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-22#炭素価格Origin: CN
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2026.102244
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2026.102244

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、中国の排出権取引制度(ETS)と再生可能エネルギー義務化(RPS)の政策相互作用を分析。1995~2021年の州別パネルデータを用い、RPSがETSの限界削減インセンティブを弱める「クラウディングアウト効果」を実証した。企業が発電構成を調整し炭素取引への依存を減らすメカニズムを解明し、地域別の政策調整や炭素価格下限の導入を提言する。

English

This study examines how China's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) interacts with its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Using provincial panel data from 1995-2021, it finds that higher RPS quotas dilute carbon price signals by compressing the ETS's marginal abatement scope. Firms shift their generation mix, reducing reliance on carbon trading. The paper proposes regionally differentiated coordination strategies, including a carbon price floor.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国の事例だが、日本でも再エネ導入拡大とカーボンプライシングの政策調和が課題であり、示唆に富む。SSBJや有報での気候関連開示において、政策リスク評価の参考となる。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence on how overlapping climate policies (RPS and ETS) can undermine carbon price signals, a critical concern for global ETS design. It offers insights for jurisdictions like the EU and US considering similar policy mixes, and highlights the need for policy coordination.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Researchers studying policy interactions in carbon markets will find empirical evidence from China's dual policy implementation.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can learn how overlapping regulations affect carbon market dynamics and compliance strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should consider the potential for renewable mandates to dilute carbon price signals and explore region-specific coordination measures.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Abstract A major challenge in achieving deep decarbonization is whether the simultaneous implementation of multiple low-carbon policies in the power sector undermines the marginal abatement incentives generated by carbon markets. Using provincial panel data from 1995 to 2021, this study develops an econometric framework that combines multi-period difference-in-differences with two-stage least squares to assess how the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) reshapes the effectiveness of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), with a focus on policy interactions that attenuate marginal abatement incentives in the carbon market and the associated transmission mechanisms. The results show that although the RPS alone significantly reduces carbon intensity in the power sector, higher RPS quota weights tend to compress the marginal abatement scope available to the ETS, thereby weakening the ETS's incremental incentive effects. Mechanism analysis reveals that under elevated RPS obligations, firms are more inclined to achieve compliance through structural adjustments in their generation mix. This reconfiguration reduces reliance on carbon trading, which in turn suppresses market activity and weakens the price signal and incentive function of carbon pricing. In provinces with high RPS quota intensity, carbon market incentives tend to be crowded out, while in regions with lower weights, policy complementarities in emission reduction are more evident. A lack of policy coordination can cause the RPS to suppress ETS price signals. Accordingly, this paper proposes regionally differentiated coordination strategies, including optimizing the composition of RPS quotas and introducing a carbon price floor, to improve the carbon market's operational efficiency and institutional resilience. • Demonstrates that RPS mandates dilute carbon price signals and weaken ETS incentives. • Shows how RPS quota intensity moderates ETS performance. • Validates mechanisms linking energy mix shifts to carbon pricing dynamics.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。