Structural Dependence and Attitudinal Divergence: A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Power Acceptance between Highly- and Lowly-Nuclear-Power-Dependent Countries in Europe
構造的依存と態度の乖離：欧州における高原子力依存国と低原子力依存国間の原子力受容性の比較分析 (AI 翻訳)
Seoyong Kim, Jangchul Song, Bonjun Koo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、欧州の高原子力依存国（HNPDC）と低原子力依存国（LNPDC）における原子力受容性の決定要因を比較分析しました。知覚された利益と信頼が最も強い正の予測因子であり、知覚リスクが最も強い負の予測因子であることが分かりました。HNPDCでは原発への近接性と情報レベルが、LNPDCでは教育水準が重要な役割を果たしました。
English
This study compares public acceptance of nuclear power between highly and lowly nuclear-dependent countries in Europe using Eurobarometer data. Perceived benefit and trust are the strongest positive predictors; perceived risk is the strongest negative predictor. In high-dependency countries, proximity and information level are significant; in low-dependency countries, education matters more.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は福島事故後、原子力依存度が低いが、エネルギー転換の議論において原子力の位置づけは重要。本研究の知見は、日本の原子力政策における国民受容性向上のためのコミュニケーション戦略に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Public acceptance of nuclear power is critical for the global energy transition. This comparative European study reveals how national nuclear dependency shapes attitude determinants, offering insights for context-sensitive communication strategies worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for understanding how national context moderates determinants of nuclear acceptance.
🏢実務担当者:Nuclear operators and energy communicators can use findings to tailor engagement strategies based on national dependency levels.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for context-sensitive communication; high-dependency countries may need to address proximity concerns, while low-dependency countries should focus on education.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Introduction: Nuclear energy remains one of the most contested energy sources globally, and public acceptance is critical for energy policymakers. This study addresses a gap in the literature by comparing public acceptance between Highly-Nuclear-Power-Dependent Countries (HNPDCs) and Lowly-Nuclear-Power-Dependent Countries (LNPDCs) in Europe. Methodology: Using Eurobarometer 72.2 data (2009, N = 26,663; 27 EU member states), we conducted OLS regression analyses for each group, supplemented by country-level macro-indicator comparisons. HNPDCs are defined as countries where nuclear power exceeds 30% of total electricity production. Results: Perceived benefit and trust are the strongest positive predictors of nuclear acceptance; perceived risk exerts the strongest negative effect in both groups. In HNPDCs, proximity to a nuclear facility and self-assessed information level significantly predict acceptance; in LNPDCs, educational attainment plays a more prominent role. Discussion: Nuclear dependency shapes distinct cognitive pathways for attitude formation. HNPDCs exhibit higher acceptance, higher perceived risk and benefit, and stronger trust, yet also greater organized environmental opposition. Conclusions: Nuclear dependency shapes both the level and determinant structure of public attitudes, with important implications for context-sensitive energy communication strategies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2972first seen 2026-05-15 17:07:36 · last seen 2026-05-21 04:24:17
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。