← 論文一覧に戻る

METHODOLOGICAL PLATFORM OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE IN THE STUDY OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR

農業セクターの持続可能な発展のための財政支援研究における持続可能な金融の方法論的プラットフォーム (AI 翻訳)

Nataliia Maslak

Economics and Management📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-03-30#sustainable_finance対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.32782/2312-7872.1.2026.12
原典: https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-7872.1.2026.12

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、農業セクターの持続可能な発展のための財政支援を研究するための方法論的プラットフォームを提案する。システム的、弁証法的、制度的、再生産的、リスク指向のアプローチを統合し、二重重要度、リスク指向、タクソノミー適合性、社会的包摂、公正な移行、再生産的十分性の原則を組み込む。ウクライナの文脈（戦争リスク、土地改革、NBUのESG政策、欧州統合）を考慮し、フィードバックループと再生産検証回路を備えた循環的相互作用の概念モデルを提示する。

English

This paper proposes a methodological platform for studying financial support for sustainable development in the agricultural sector. It integrates systemic, dialectical, institutional, reproductive, and risk-oriented approaches, incorporating principles of double materiality, risk orientation, taxonomic compatibility, social inclusion, just transition, and reproductive sufficiency. The Ukrainian context (war risks, land reform, NBU ESG policy, European integration) is considered, and a conceptual model of cyclic interaction with feedback loops and a reproductive verification circuit is presented.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、SSBJ開示や統合報告書において農業セクターのESG統合が進む中、本論文の方法論的枠組みは、農業金融の持続可能性評価に示唆を与える。ただし、ウクライナ特有の戦争リスクや土地改革に焦点を当てており、日本の制度への直接適用は限定的。

In the global GX context

Globally, the paper contributes to the discourse on sustainable finance by offering a methodological framework that integrates ESG dimensions into agricultural financial support, relevant for post-conflict reconstruction and transition finance. It aligns with ISSB and CSRD trends emphasizing double materiality and just transition, though its Ukraine-specific focus may limit direct applicability.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework for analyzing sustainable finance in agriculture, useful for comparative studies.

🏢実務担当者:Offers principles for integrating ESG into agricultural financing mechanisms, potentially relevant for agribusinesses and financial institutions.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for policy frameworks that align financial support with sustainability goals, especially in post-conflict contexts.

📄 Abstract（原文）

The article examines the methodological foundations for the formation of financial support for sustainable development of the agricultural sector amid financial systems transformation, environmental challenges, and war-related risks. The relevance is driven by the need to redirect financial flows towards sustainable agricultural development by integrating economic, environmental, and social objectives into public financial policy. The purpose is to substantiate the author's Sustainable Finance methodological platform as a scientific basis for studying financial support for sustainable development of the agricultural sector, defining its key principles and structural elements. The research applies a complementary methodological framework combining systemic, dialectical, institutional, reproductive, and risk-oriented approaches, enabling consideration of agricultural financial support as a multi-level dynamic system of interaction between financial, economic, social, and environmental components. The Sustainable Finance concept and its role in transforming financial mechanisms are revealed with regard to the Ukrainian context: war-related risks, land reform, NBU ESG policy, and European integration. The author's platform integrating principles of double materiality, risk orientation, taxonomic compatibility, social inclusion and just transition, and reproductive sufficiency is substantiated. A conceptual model of cyclic interaction of financial support components with feedback loops and a reproductive verification circuit is proposed. The scientific novelty lies in developing a platform that combines five complementary methodological approaches, operationalises ESG dimensions for the agricultural sector, and accounts for war-related risks and institutional transformation. The practical significance lies in evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural financial support mechanisms, substantiating sustainable development financial policy parameters, and determining financing sufficiency for reproduction of productive, natural, and social capital.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。