gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Nature-Based Solutions and Human Health in Europe—A Systematic Review

欧州における自然ベースソリューションと人間の健康—系統的レビュー (AI 翻訳)

Diya Chakravorty, Maximilian Nawrath, Wenting Chen, Andrea Staccione, Chiara Bidoli, Doan Nainggolan, Marianne Zandersen, Hélène Rizzotti, Andreas Tuerk

Environments📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-28#nature_based_solutionsOrigin: EU
DOI: 10.3390/environments13060300
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13060300

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本系統的レビューは欧州における自然ベースソリューション（NbS）と人間の健康との関連を検討した115件の研究を分析。都市と森林生態系が中心で、英国とスペインに集中。精神的健康への影響が身体的健康より多く研究され、88%の定量研究が少なくとも一つの正の関連を報告。NbS計画への健康統合の必要性を指摘。

English

This systematic review examines the links between nature-based solutions (NbS) and human health in Europe, analyzing 115 studies across multiple ecosystem types, predominantly urban and forest. Studies concentrated in the UK and Spain, with mental health outcomes studied more than physical. Nearly 88% of quantitative studies reported positive associations, while qualitative studies highlighted subjective experiences. The review calls for longitudinal research and better integration of health into NbS policy.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でもNbSの導入が進むが、本レビューは欧州中心。日本における健康便益のエビデンス構築の参考になる可能性。

In the global GX context

In the global GX context, this review underscores the health co-benefits of NbS as climate adaptation, relevant to TCFD/ISSB's focus on social aspects and the EU's adaptation strategy.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Highlights the need for longitudinal and experimental research designs to strengthen evidence on NbS-health links.

🏢実務担当者:Provides evidence to justify NbS investments for health co-benefits in urban planning and ecosystem management.

🏛政策担当者:Supports integrating health outcomes into climate adaptation and NbS policy frameworks.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly promoted in European policy for their potential to support climate adaptation and contribute to human health. Yet evidence on their health impacts remains fragmented across disciplines and limited to specific health outcomes or ecosystems. We carried out a systematic review of studies assessing the links between NbS and human health in Europe, covering multiple ecosystem types (agricultural, coastal, forest, mountain, urban, rural and freshwater ecosystems) and both mental and physical health outcomes. A total of 115 studies met the inclusion criteria and were concentrated in the United Kingdom (38%) and Spain (17%), with urban (45%) and forest (17%) ecosystems most frequently examined. Most studies evaluated Type 1 NbS (minimal intervention) and focused on adult populations (58%). Mental health outcomes were studied nearly twice as often as physical health, including positive mental health, circulatory diseases and mental and behavioural disorders. Nearly 88% of quantitative studies reported at least one positive association, whereas qualitative studies highlighted that perceived health benefits of NbS were often shaped by participants’ subjective experiences. Our findings emphasise the need for more longitudinal and experimental research designs, attention to NbS types and equity considerations, and better integration of human health into NbS planning and policy.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。