Barriers and levers in the implementation of coastal nature-based solutions in France
フランスにおける沿岸自然解⽅の導⼊における障壁と促進要因 (AI 翻訳)
Mouncef Sédrati, Laura Dalour, Glen Bulot, Noé Metge
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はフランス初の全国規模の沿岸自然解⽅（NbS）評価を提供する。89プロジェクトを特定し、60%がハイブリッド型。導⼊の障壁として社会的受容性、規制の複雑さ、資金調達の断片化を指摘。6つの勧告を提案する。
English
This study provides the first national-scale assessment of coastal nature-based solutions (NbS) in France. 89 projects identified, 60% hybrid. Barriers: low social acceptance, regulatory complexity, fragmented funding. Six recommendations proposed to accelerate NbS implementation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
⽇本でも沿岸防災としてNbS関⼼⾼まる。フランスの障壁分析（社会的受容性、規制、資⾦）は⽇本の政策にも参考になる。
In the global GX context
This French case study adds to the growing evidence on NbS barriers and levers, relevant for countries integrating NbS into coastal adaptation strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a systematic assessment methodology and identifies research gaps in socio-economic impact evaluation.
🏢実務担当者:Provides practical recommendations for project developers and coastal managers facing implementation hurdles.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights need for clearer definitions, streamlined regulations, and sustained funding for NbS.
📄 Abstract（原文）
• Hybrid nature-based solutions are predominant in France • Social acceptability, procedures, and financing are the main difficulties encountered by coastal managers • France still lacks nature-based solution projects compared to its European neighbors • Six recommendations are proposed to support the implementation of nature-based solutions project . Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly recognized as viable alternatives to conventional coastal defenses, offering risk reduction and climate adaptation benefits while sustaining ecosystem services. Despite growing international interest, the extent of NbS deployment in France remains limited and insufficiently documented. This study presents the first national-scale assessment of coastal NbS in France, combining a literature review with a structured survey of 47 coastal managers. We identified 89 projects, including 52 NbS initiatives, 60% of which were hybrid approaches integrating NbS with soft or hard engineering measures. Dunes and marshes emerged as the most frequently targeted ecosystems, with NbS adoption motivated by adaptability, cost-effectiveness, and socioecological co-benefits. However, implementation faces persistent barriers: low social acceptance, complex regulatory frameworks, and fragmented funding mechanisms. Monitoring practices are uneven, with biodiversity and physical parameters frequently assessed, but socio-economic impacts rarely evaluated. Funding is predominantly public and multi-sourced, yet often inadequate for long-term maintenance and evaluation. Drawing on these findings, we propose six strategic recommendations to enhance NbS uptake: (1) strengthen knowledge sharing and visibility, (2) moving toward operational and shared definitions of NbS, (3) broaden public engagement, (4) diversify and adapt funding, (5) reinforce political and regulatory support, and (6) support pilot and hybrid approaches. By identifying systemic barriers and actionable levers, this study provides practical insights to accelerate the integration of NbS into coastal planning in France and inform international efforts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100339first seen 2026-06-17 05:21:08 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:13:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。