gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Sustainable Transition from nZEB to ZEB in a Northern Climate: Annual Energy Performance and Whole-Life Carbon Implications of Passive and Renewable Design Choices

北部気候におけるnZEBからZEBへの持続可能な移行:パッシブおよび再生可能設計選択による年間エネルギー性能と全ライフサイクルカーボンの影響 (AI 翻訳)

Monika Grinevičiūtė, Kęstutis Valančius, Violeta Motuzienė

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-02#省エネOrigin: EU経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.3390/su18115626
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115626

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

リトアニアの住宅を対象に、nZEBからZEBへの移行におけるエネルギー性能と全ライフサイクルカーボンを統合的に評価。シミュレーションとLCAを用い、PV、蓄電池、パッシブ設計の効果を定量化。2080年の気候シナリオ下での変化も分析。

English

This study integrates annual energy simulations and whole-life carbon assessment for a Lithuanian dwelling under current and future climate scenarios, evaluating passive cooling, PV/storage, and material choices. Results show that a combined design approach yields significant carbon reductions, supporting EPBD-aligned ZEB design.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではZEHやLCA義務化の議論が進んでおり、本論文の統合的設計フレームワークは今後の基準策定に示唆を与える。特に寒冷地の住宅設計において、パッシブ・再生可能エネルギー・材料選択の同時評価の重要性を実証。

In the global GX context

This paper provides case-study evidence for EPBD implementation, showing that passive cooling, PV/storage, and biogenic insulation should be evaluated jointly in ZEB design. The integrated methodology supports the Level(s) framework and whole-life carbon disclosure requirements.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:An integrated simulation-LCA methodology for assessing annual energy and whole-life carbon under future climate scenarios.

🏢実務担当者:Evidence that combined passive and active design strategies yield greater carbon reductions than sequential approaches in northern-climate residential buildings.

🏛政策担当者:Informs EPBD revision and national building codes on the need to consider future climate and whole-life carbon simultaneously.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The recast Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) accelerates the transition from nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) to zero-emission buildings (ZEBs), requiring solar readiness and life-cycle Global Warming Potential (GWP) disclosure. Yet operational performance, future-climate adaptation and whole-life carbon (WLC) are still often assessed separately, limiting actionable evidence for residential ZEB design in northern climates. This study provides an integrated design-decision framework coupling annual IDA-ICE simulations under five weather scenarios, including Urban Heat Island (UHI)-adjusted present and 2080 RCP8.5 + UHI files, with an EN 15978/Level(s)-based WLC assessment in One Click LCA for twelve design cases of a Lithuanian dwelling. For the PV-equipped baseline, heating electricity decreases by 24% and cooling increases by 31% from present conditions to 2080 RCP8.5 + UHI. External shading and night purge provide the strongest annual cooling and operative-temperature-exceedance reductions. The ZEB baseline reduces WLC by 19.0% relative to A0; the biogenic-insulation green-roof case gives the lowest non-storage WLC (−25.2%); and battery-assisted cases provide the largest reductions under the static B6 electricity factor (up to −52.1%). The findings provide case-study evidence that EPBD-aligned residential ZEB design should evaluate passive cooling, PV/storage and material choices jointly, rather than sequentially, when developing future performance thresholds and design guidance.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。