中国の石炭転換をめぐる政治と政策：気候緩和への示唆
The politics and policies governing China’s coal transition: implications for climate mitigation (原題)
Weila Gong, Joanna I. Lewis
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、中国の石炭転換政策の形成過程を、官僚機構の役割に焦点を当てて分析する。2013年から2025年までの国家レベルの石炭政策データセットを分析し、環境保護省主導の石炭削減政策は、国家発展改革委員会や国家能源局が推進する石炭生産維持政策よりも弱いことを明らかにした。このことは、中国の脱炭素目標達成には、環境・経済目標の調整と政策手段の強化が必要であることを示唆する。
English
This study analyzes the politics of China's coal transition, focusing on bureaucratic roles. Using an original dataset of national coal policies from 2013-2025, it finds that coal-reduction policies led by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment are weaker than coal-production policies from the NDRC and NEA. The authors argue that achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 requires better coordination and stronger policy instruments.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の石炭政策の官僚的対立は、日本のエネルギー政策や石炭火力輸出戦略にも示唆を与える。中国の石炭需要が続く中、日本のGX政策はアジアの脱炭素協調を考慮する必要がある。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global climate policy scholarship by examining bureaucratic competition in an authoritarian context, offering insights for international cooperation on coal phase-down and climate mitigation.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:官僚政治と気候政策の交差を理解するための実証的基盤を提供。
🏢実務担当者:中国市場での事業戦略やサプライチェーンリスク評価に有用。
🏛政策担当者:国際的な石炭政策調整や対中協力の検討に示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract As the world’s largest coal producer and consumer, China’s coal transition is crucial to the global low-carbon energy transition and achieving global climate goals. Yet over the past decade, despite goals to limit coal use, reduce air pollution and achieve climate goals, China’s domestic coal consumption has continued to grow. This trend calls into question China’s state capacity to transition away from coal. This study examines the policy frames introduced by the Chinese government related to coal transition and the role of bureaucracy in shaping the coal transition process. By analyzing an original dataset of coal policies promulgated by the national government between 2013 and 2025, we find while the national government has introduced a series of policies targeting the coal industry, the policy instruments for coal reduction led by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment are much weaker than those maintaining coal production advanced by the National Development and Reform Commission and National Energy Administration. This paper greatly improves our understanding of the politics of China’s coal transition and the role of bureaucratic agencies with diverging interests in influencing China’s state capacity in low-carbon energy transitions. At the same time, it also advances the literature of state capacity and climate policy by shifting the focus from the separation of power in the bureaucracy of Western industrial democracies to the competing bureaucratic influence over coal policymaking in emerging authoritarian economies such as China. We argue that to achieve its 2060 carbon neutrality pledge, the Chinese government must further coordinate its environmental and economic goals while strengthening its entire suite of policy instruments that support coal reduction.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1088/2753-3751/ae6596first seen 2026-08-20 04:36:31
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。